Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=att.net;
	b=lRJxsVCV7n9qntDDIOqef8K/GcrnULep0qTVfgivZkvUPCjToBKLqcCbzIVOfiIS+fnPiuTKdY89Fx16dj3UG+Dkcc4W+c5St+jHwmbWeDYNN6SjJmLsxV4qDSUuN7PJlT3ycMz/cOwuE4dOjq0aQEKAhiD6eZZRzRtTK99m7O0=;
Message-ID: <54352C57.1000604@att.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 07:21:43 -0500
From: Shawn McKinney <mckinney-2112@att.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@directory.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fortress IP clearance
References: <5433A07F.9040505@gmail.com> <5433EADD.8090309@symas.com>
 <54351414.3090001@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <54351414.3090001@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 10/08/2014 05:38 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Typically, here are the info I'll need :
> - the code base URL, with a MD5/SHA checksum, at the very date of the
> donation (ie, if we have some modification after this date, then they
> should be retained and injected into teh code base when moved to The ASF
> repository. All in all, it's a matter of building a zip and sign it, and
> move it to a place we can download it (can be teh latest release, for
> instance)

What date are we considering the donation date - today?  Assuming it is 
that, I will download latest snapshot from each of the four repos (core, 
commander, enmasse, realm), sign, and then upload to one of our file 
servers.

On 10/08/2014 05:38 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> - a Corporate CLA (from Joshua tree and Symas) as to be fulfilled and
> sent to The ASF

Yes, I will arrange this.

On 10/08/2014 05:38 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> The list of all the people having worked on the code base, with their
> consent

Again yes, no problem.


On 10/08/2014 05:38 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> The list of dependencies with their licence have to be checked to be
> sure they are compatible (ie, " Apache, BSD, Artistic, MIT/X, MIT/W3C,
> MPL 1.1, or something with essentially the same terms").

So here I am assuming the dependencies in the pom.xml are not adequate.  
Rather we need to list the resolved dependencies, i.e. located in the 
/lib folder, for each project.  I will take care of this too.