directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Emmanuel Lecharny (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (DIRAPI-112) Review Package Names
Date Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:24:23 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Emmanuel Lecharny updated DIRAPI-112:
-------------------------------------

    Fix Version/s:     (was: 1.0.0-M15)
                       (was: 1.0.0-RC1)
                   1.0.0-M18
    
> Review Package Names
> --------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRAPI-112
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRAPI-112
>             Project: Directory Client API
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Stefan Seelmann
>             Fix For: 1.0.0-M18
>
>
> The package names should be reviewed. Package names are not consistent and IMHO too long.
So here I just put some questions and ideas.
> Example from ldap-model:
> org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.model.name.Dn
> - Do we need the *shared* in package names? I think we can remove it, everything that
doesn't start with o.a.d.studio or o.a.d.server in the name is implicitly a 'shared' package.
> - Should we keep the *model* in package names? While I understand that during refactoring
it's easier to see the model packages, it isn't common in other APIs.
> The result could be: org.apache.directory.ldap.name.Dn
> Example from ldap-client-api:
> org.apache.directory.ldap.client.api.LdapConnection
> - Do we need the 'client.api' in package names? I think we can remove it, everything
with o.a.d.ldap in the name is implicitly the LDAP API.
> The result could be: org.apache.directory.ldap.LdapConnection

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message