Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70B5FFC4C for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 14:44:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32344 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2013 14:44:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 32147 invoked by uid 500); 1 May 2013 14:44:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 32138 invoked by uid 99); 1 May 2013 14:44:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 May 2013 14:44:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.51] (HELO mail-wg0-f51.google.com) (74.125.82.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 May 2013 14:44:05 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id b12so1403588wgh.6 for ; Wed, 01 May 2013 07:43:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+mMJvg5o7FA81ds3T+dWcw023PMqOWN3kLcgRx5l5pw=; b=cJBIANKPdvHWm7XDqFbbbXOQxSgLIW7yYBoWOoxql5fZHnfRpjU/trmaoFV2lRn/0V t46hizaYL5V1SY6cGlKqJSS23cvFb2Dfc2vK5CJbsDj4szgiqEZmNe7jX2X2Vn8EIK26 kKKz/zwmiDz8YTdcXyzZMFS58HBdRGi/ztrN4gaYw4a8lyrARcXZCXU2MTuBu5UlAmBf w4WWbe5Jtgh7IOyMW3MOMu+dY22i7ri9J2hWtzazp47wh+ob44EiJS9EPSYro8iHupbH URcEHNYf+bhxsYH7SzDsjvcRuxkIs8OZ+S+y2OJdhlYaERcmqXhgjTk2/zfRu6OQMdpy kgzA== X-Received: by 10.181.12.1 with SMTP id em1mr21358232wid.4.1367419425273; Wed, 01 May 2013 07:43:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Emmanuels-MacBook-Pro.local (ran75-1-78-192-106-184.fbxo.proxad.net. [78.192.106.184]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x13sm4377859wib.3.2013.05.01.07.43.44 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 01 May 2013 07:43:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51812A1F.8090305@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 16:43:43 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?RW1tYW51ZWwgTMOpY2hhcm55?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: I'll move some of the extended operations and controls from ldap-api-extra-codec(-api) to api-ldap-codec-core References: <5180D6FE.2080905@gmail.com> <5180DB79.3020409@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Le 5/1/13 12:25 PM, Radu Creanga a écrit : > -1 for including the pwdModify as part of the connection API and don't care > for the move from extra to core. > > None of you have heard from me before and I'm not sure my vote can count > for anything, but I hope the comments will. There is no formal vote, so your opinion is certainly valuable. This is why I pushed the mail here (alhought I should have said "I'd like to " instead of "I will". > > PwdModify is an extended request that is optional for a directory server - > AD for example does not support it, at least not out of the box. But, by > including it as part of the connection API you're creating the wrong > impression that it is a standard/universal operation such as add, modify, > delete, search, etc. I will think again about my proposal. I will start by moving the startTLS extended request, which is supported by all the servers. Regarding the pwdModify extended request, I can provide an utility class that make it easiers to send it to the servers that support it. Thanks for your feedback, this is certainly good food for thoughts ! -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com