directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot ...@marcelot.net>
Subject Re: Authz with ACI needs a serious review
Date Fri, 17 May 2013 16:50:17 GMT
2.1 sounds good to me.

Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud

On 17 mai 2013, at 18:46, Emmanuel L├ęcharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi guys,
> 
> as I was trying to evaluate a JIRA
> (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-997), I tried to
> implement a solution based on ACI. I failed...
> 
> This part of the code needs a serious review. Not that it's buggy, to
> some extent, it works, but it's extremly difficult to know what's going
> on when we process an operation, as we don't have log.
> 
> I'm afraid that we may want to postpone this to 2.0-RC2, or worse, to 2.1.
> 
> This is one part of the code I haven't looked yet (one of the last one,
> with the Triggers and SP, I guess :) so I may be totally off base, but I
> don't feel ready to provide any help to any user if we release the
> server with this good feature.
> 
> In my opinion, 2.1 is good enough for such an important feature : if
> users are aware that fine grained protection is not yet ready, they can
> make a sane choice, instead of believing that we do offer a working
> authorization system. I seriously don't think that we can update the
> doc, fix the code, and learn how to us it, in less than one month anyway.
> 
> Is it just me ?
> Any thought ?
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel L├ęcharny
> www.iktek.com 
> 


Mime
View raw message