Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F911E63B for ; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:36:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 56616 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2013 09:36:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 56515 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2013 09:36:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 56504 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2013 09:36:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 09:36:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pajbam@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.172] (HELO mail-we0-f172.google.com) (74.125.82.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 09:36:45 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id d46so3471069wer.17 for ; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 01:36:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:content-type:message-id:mime-version:subject :date:references:to:in-reply-to:x-mailer; bh=R6sNYr0E+tu/QobMKTns4qcJzPFi9s7tsporKaQeZi4=; b=aRiqVeg7Fs4ikXpMR1A3ualt/r/5yTNlaGqiEkTem/SOGozvdbfN7ohYG7XgZdGOsH 9mqlqEvcevX82V3fTh5VaQEDmRn6LOzREcP4FzGfqbGVmz11c6zt4zzeydXN5QhoZVKu zLjFxF7SKo9GtbRoXvNkdACI9izjWVOwR3jfW0h68+RWQ9JPZcIG1QgYiCuwNnC/8aYT NwXJx5gKyiKlhkoyIRbiJ0HTJyUTS7QL9jnGNzOj/iaQU8eaXY64xYRdk3Or16iFY4Wd LNApOLvOiw1VryKtD/eBGw7wjmbGPaqUtj8fji4tlYo+22KJUzTBXnqILFJJE7Mr1mzX nS7Q== X-Received: by 10.194.58.202 with SMTP id t10mr45606413wjq.4.1362562584531; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 01:36:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (lon92-10-78-226-4-211.fbx.proxad.net. [78.226.4.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r7sm9214677wiz.2.2013.03.06.01.36.22 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Mar 2013 01:36:23 -0800 (PST) Sender: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot From: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_56317814-C06B-4EA2-B83E-CE63D8BE97DF" Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: Faiing builds Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 10:36:22 +0100 References: <5136EBD3.1020306@gmail.com> To: "Apache Directory Developers List" In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail=_56317814-C06B-4EA2-B83E-CE63D8BE97DF Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 On 6 mars 2013, at 10:34, Kiran Ayyagari wrote: >=20 >=20 > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot = wrote: > Hi Emmanuel, >=20 > =46rom what I've seen checking the logs, this test is failing on = ApacheDS: > = org.apache.directory.server.replication.ClientServerReplicationIT.testRebo= otConsumer() >=20 > all the replication tests are passing on my machine > java - 1.6.0_26-b03 > ubuntu - 12.04 32 bit=20 Last time I checked (just a few days ago), they were all passing fine, = except the one I ignored and opened a JIRA for. Regards, Pierre-Arnaud > We also have weird out of memory and heap size issues on LDAP API and = Studio jobs. > I don't understand why these build would suddenly fail on issues like = that after having run for years now pretty fine with the current = settings... >=20 > I will have a look at the configuration and tweak a few things here = and there. >=20 > There are also other failed build due to JVM being terminated, but I'm = afraid we can't do anything with these ones. > The machine on which the jobs are executed was probably overloaded at = some point and had to release resources. > These ones look like false-positive to me, because usually they go = back up at the next build. >=20 > Anyways, I'll definitely have look at that today. >=20 > Regards, > Pierre-Arnaud >=20 >=20 > On 6 mars 2013, at 08:10, Emmanuel L=E9charny = wrote: >=20 > > Hi guys, > > > > we have failing builds every day on Jenkins. We probably have some = tests > > that fail due to some time condition (for instance, the > > ClientAbandonRequestTest.testCancelSearch test is failing on slow = machines). > > > > We also have a test failing on eplication (moddn) that need to be = fixed > > (Pierre-Arnaud has @Ignored it atm). > > > > We need to investigate those breakages. > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Cordialement, > > Emmanuel L=E9charny > > www.iktek.com > > >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Kiran Ayyagari > http://keydap.com --Apple-Mail=_56317814-C06B-4EA2-B83E-CE63D8BE97DF Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 kayyagari@apache.org> = wrote:


On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at = 1:16 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa@marcelot.net> wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,

=46rom what I've seen checking the logs, this test is failing on = ApacheDS:
= org.apache.directory.server.replication.ClientServerReplicationIT.testRebo= otConsumer()

all the replication tests are passing on my = machine
java - 1.6.0_26-b03
ubuntu - 12.04 32 bit =

Last time I checked = (just a few days ago), they were all passing fine, except the one I = ignored and opened a JIRA = for.

Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud

We also have weird out of memory and heap size issues on LDAP API and = Studio jobs.
I don't understand why these build would suddenly fail on issues like = that after having run for years now pretty fine with the current = settings...

I will have a look at the configuration and tweak a few things here and = there.

There are also other failed build due to JVM being terminated, but I'm = afraid we can't do anything with these ones.
The machine on which the jobs are executed was probably overloaded at = some point and had to release resources.
These ones look like false-positive to me, because usually they go back = up at the next build.

Anyways, I'll definitely have look at that today.

Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud


On 6 mars 2013, at 08:10, Emmanuel L=E9charny <elecharny@gmail.com> = wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> we have failing builds every day on Jenkins. We probably have some = tests
> that fail due to some time condition (for instance, the
> ClientAbandonRequestTest.testCancelSearch test is failing on slow = machines).
>
> We also have a test failing on eplication (moddn) that need to be = fixed
> (Pierre-Arnaud has @Ignored it atm).
>
> We need to investigate those breakages.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel L=E9charny
> www.iktek.com
>




--
Kiran = Ayyagari
http://keydap.com
= --Apple-Mail=_56317814-C06B-4EA2-B83E-CE63D8BE97DF--