My +1 too, if that's the case.
On 22 mars 2013, at 14:34, Emmanuel Lécharny <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Le 3/22/13 2:25 PM, Kiran Ayyagari a écrit :
>> Hi guys,
>> We have an issue in the server where the admin (uid=admin,ou=system)
>> account can get locked
>> permanently based on the ppolicy configuration to lock accounts .
>> IMO we should allow all user and admin accounts to get locked
>> permanently (again, based on the ppolicy config)
>> except the system's built-in admin account (uid=admin,ou=system). This
>> is just to prevent any abuse involving a
>> regular admin account.
> Let me sum up :
> - any user can be locked permanently
> - admin users may also be locked permanently
> - the super-admin cannot be locked permanently
> correct ? (If so, my +1)
IMO, admins should be able to unlock admins as well.
> That raises another question here (see ) :
> - assuming that  is solved, the super admin can unlock all the users
> *and* all the admins ?
> - a 'normal' admin can only lock users, not admins ?
> PS : admins are the account present in the administrators branch atm.
> Won't it make sense to get rid of such a distinction, and to uses ACI
> instead ?
I'd expect it to work that way as a user, personally.
I see the exception we would make on making the lock of the super-admin impossible, more of a preventing measure to have at least one non-locked bindable user that can unlock others.
>>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1812
>  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1813
> Emmanuel Lécharny