From dev-return-42638-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org Wed Mar 6 09:52:08 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94654E6E0 for ; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:52:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10582 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2013 09:52:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 10543 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2013 09:52:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 10527 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2013 09:52:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 09:52:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of pajbam@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.43] (HELO mail-wg0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 09:52:01 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id e12so7320567wge.22 for ; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 01:51:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:content-type:message-id:mime-version:subject :date:references:to:in-reply-to:x-mailer; bh=rpd8DUzSEqkL3MRidfDsH3evnpdoJIicqBgSeuMB49A=; b=p1VOod2L82QJfiu3N8oxikuHk/+1UFxWjzsWGDWgnmUyGVtme9Be/G0ts4g94XL/tr dw39pD0b6gk7SFZ46mK0XYoO+rO/GAQ3ra164jXiYOaZiDgWrDA4nYS0QThh38lvkwkD N18VCt3OTi1VxfsqxK3ep2dvhqoA2Mo0g+DlwY3xI5P1LmBq/r/7qKRRUj21YwHXRRsw pNmzkmRDvnDDcwFjh4ljG6LoNNgRUMXEdp1qEGg2AK/+3xpASpHPazBlCp6Rd16L9Haw 5ZQKoj+HeP87Io1I434k0maKOUiPiscbEmE9Ilq4xAeSFk1ImXDEpIRcKv6Pf2uFd/d2 WwXA== X-Received: by 10.180.83.10 with SMTP id m10mr24665331wiy.5.1362563500918; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 01:51:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (lon92-10-78-226-4-211.fbx.proxad.net. [78.226.4.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n10sm28280825wia.0.2013.03.06.01.51.39 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Mar 2013 01:51:40 -0800 (PST) Sender: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot From: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AECA1EAA-C5BE-4F9E-AFEF-29F33A4412EE" Message-Id: <8EE6F438-3615-466D-AD03-B61947198BC3@marcelot.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: Faiing builds Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 10:51:38 +0100 References: <5136EBD3.1020306@gmail.com> To: "Apache Directory Developers List" , elecharny@apache.org In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail=_AECA1EAA-C5BE-4F9E-AFEF-29F33A4412EE Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 I'm not really sure it's a time factor because I increased the wait time = before checking the replicated entry and it still failed constantly... = :( Other than that, I checked most of our Jenkins Jobs. Last night crashes for all these jobs is due to a lack of space on the = Windows machine: java.io.IOException: There is not enough space on the disk Sometimes we also get a VM crash due to a lack of memory. I checked on these particular machine and other builds are failing too, = so this is not specific to our projects. I guess infra will probably clean the machine ASAP, releasing disk space = and memory. So, there's nothing we can do on our site and there's probably no issue = too. We just need to wait, I guess. Regards, Pierre-Arnaud On 6 mars 2013, at 10:43, Emmanuel Lecharny = wrote: > I have it failing on a slow machine. There is definitively a time = factor in this test. >=20 > Le 6 mars 2013 10:40, "Kiran Ayyagari" a =E9crit = : > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot = wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 6 mars 2013, at 10:34, Kiran Ayyagari = wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot = wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi Emmanuel, > >>>> > >>>> =46rom what I've seen checking the logs, this test is failing on = ApacheDS: > >>>> = org.apache.directory.server.replication.ClientServerReplicationIT.testRebo= otConsumer() > >>>> > >>> all the replication tests are passing on my machine > >>> java - 1.6.0_26-b03 > >>> ubuntu - 12.04 32 bit=20 > >> > >> > >> Last time I checked (just a few days ago), they were all passing = fine, except the one I ignored and opened a JIRA for. > >> > > ya, I tested again after removing the @Ignore annotation > >> > >> Regards, > >> Pierre-Arnaud > >> > >>>> We also have weird out of memory and heap size issues on LDAP API = and Studio jobs. > >>>> I don't understand why these build would suddenly fail on issues = like that after having run for years now pretty fine with the current = settings... > >>>> > >>>> I will have a look at the configuration and tweak a few things = here and there. > >>>> > >>>> There are also other failed build due to JVM being terminated, = but I'm afraid we can't do anything with these ones. > >>>> The machine on which the jobs are executed was probably = overloaded at some point and had to release resources. > >>>> These ones look like false-positive to me, because usually they = go back up at the next build. > >>>> > >>>> Anyways, I'll definitely have look at that today. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Pierre-Arnaud > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 6 mars 2013, at 08:10, Emmanuel L=E9charny = wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > Hi guys, > >>>> > > >>>> > we have failing builds every day on Jenkins. We probably have = some tests > >>>> > that fail due to some time condition (for instance, the > >>>> > ClientAbandonRequestTest.testCancelSearch test is failing on = slow machines). > >>>> > > >>>> > We also have a test failing on eplication (moddn) that need to = be fixed > >>>> > (Pierre-Arnaud has @Ignored it atm). > >>>> > > >>>> > We need to investigate those breakages. > >>>> > > >>>> > -- > >>>> > Regards, > >>>> > Cordialement, > >>>> > Emmanuel L=E9charny > >>>> > www.iktek.com > >>>> > > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> --=20 > >>> Kiran Ayyagari > >>> http://keydap.com > >> > >> > > > > > > > > --=20 > > Kiran Ayyagari > > http://keydap.com >=20 --Apple-Mail=_AECA1EAA-C5BE-4F9E-AFEF-29F33A4412EE Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 I'm = not really sure it's a time factor because I increased the wait time = before checking the replicated entry and it still failed constantly... = :(

Other than that, I checked most of our Jenkins = Jobs.
Last night crashes for all these jobs is due to a lack = of space on the Windows machine:
elecharny@apache.org> =
wrote:

I have it failing on a slow machine. There is = definitively a time factor in this test.

Le 6 mars 2013 10:40, = "Kiran Ayyagari" <kayyagari@apache.org> a = =E9crit :
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa@marcelot.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6 mars 2013, at 10:34, Kiran Ayyagari <kayyagari@apache.org> = wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot = <pa@marcelot.net> = wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Emmanuel,
>>>>
>>>> =46rom what I've seen checking the logs, this test is = failing on ApacheDS:
>>>> = org.apache.directory.server.replication.ClientServerReplicationIT.testRebo= otConsumer()
>>>>
>>> all the replication tests are passing on my machine
>>> java - 1.6.0_26-b03
>>> ubuntu - 12.04 32 bit
>>
>>
>> Last time I checked (just a few days ago), they were all = passing fine, except the one I ignored and opened a JIRA for.
>>
> ya, I tested again after removing the @Ignore annotation
>>
>> Regards,
>> Pierre-Arnaud
>>
>>>> We also have weird out of memory and heap size issues = on LDAP API and Studio jobs.
>>>> I don't understand why these build would suddenly fail = on issues like that after having run for years now pretty fine with the = current settings...
>>>>
>>>> I will have a look at the configuration and tweak a few = things here and there.
>>>>
>>>> There are also other failed build due to JVM being = terminated, but I'm afraid we can't do anything with these ones.
>>>> The machine on which the jobs are executed was probably = overloaded at some point and had to release resources.
>>>> These ones look like false-positive to me, because = usually they go back up at the next build.
>>>>
>>>> Anyways, I'll definitely have look at that today.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Pierre-Arnaud
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 6 mars 2013, at 08:10, Emmanuel L=E9charny <elecharny@gmail.com> = wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Hi guys,
>>>> >
>>>> > we have failing builds every day on Jenkins. We = probably have some tests
>>>> > that fail due to some time condition (for = instance, the
>>>> > ClientAbandonRequestTest.testCancelSearch test is = failing on slow machines).
>>>> >
>>>> > We also have a test failing on eplication (moddn) = that need to be fixed
>>>> > (Pierre-Arnaud has @Ignored it atm).
>>>> >
>>>> > We need to investigate those breakages.
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Regards,
>>>> > Cordialement,
>>>> > Emmanuel L=E9charny
>>>> > www.iktek.com
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Kiran Ayyagari
>>> http://keydap.com
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Kiran Ayyagari
> http://keydap.com


= --Apple-Mail=_AECA1EAA-C5BE-4F9E-AFEF-29F33A4412EE--