From dev-return-42409-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org Wed Feb 13 09:40:52 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65617E736 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:40:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69406 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2013 09:40:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 69306 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2013 09:40:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 69287 invoked by uid 99); 13 Feb 2013 09:40:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:40:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_REMOTE_IMAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of pajbam@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.175] (HELO mail-ia0-f175.google.com) (209.85.210.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:40:45 +0000 Received: by mail-ia0-f175.google.com with SMTP id r4so1033478iaj.34 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 01:40:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:references:from:in-reply-to:mime-version:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=buySMGgnTTAnJ7xRSQwBhlVisNKk25rIb+ZxU/WQfyM=; b=No0jVeb4xEi+im9/NjVEO7tba0dVWmHRnS48e/XzjexgAy3Il+cJ10ZL4YK6J0t2k+ EDvaM/WdJjflW5lXU9DqBn24sRDdCAiBqKlNEbaDgbSCzFa4beNioFBr/+1mWWJmr3Nq DBCxtkVNql8Go/UPq1mYPTITYSHlIzZIR4JI6miBX4OejeH9t8CtQrnyjAJmyBrhq5Qm qIdtdnc+R5v0dgQ17ao2p87PgP5Tl8T28dhwXQwczRScqeFnJV4Hh4t7a26f0rnW2pkh W4ZGytSv5EcXwjD4/JJe04VA3GU624/NGMP2R2c8IslOdQlaskGgLnIGx93l92R+xPZO HhyA== X-Received: by 10.50.237.5 with SMTP id uy5mr9853712igc.12.1360748424063; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 01:40:24 -0800 (PST) References: <511B5D48.5070600@orange.fr> From: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:40:26 +0100 Message-ID: <8700037418326701421@unknownmsgid> Subject: Re: AD Studio : official version of Eclipse for building/debugging Studio To: Apache Directory Developers List Cc: "francis.andre.kampbell@orange.fr" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044787fb71ec6604d597ee7d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d044787fb71ec6604d597ee7d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 and it looks really really bad on a Mac (terrible UI implementation on Eclipse 4). On my side, I'm stuck with version 3.8.2. Regards, Pierre-Arnaud Le 13 f=E9vr. 2013 =E0 10:35, Jeff MAURY a =E9cri= t : I would not recommand using Juno as it faces memory leaks and scaling issues (at least until SR2 is out). Regards Jeff On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Francis ANDRE < francis.andre.kampbell@orange.fr> wrote: > Hi > > By looking at this page http://directory.apache.org/**studio/building.htm= lor the wiki pages at > https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/DIRxSTUDIO/**Working, > I did not found any requirements about the Eclipse version for > building/running/debugging the Apache Directory Studio nor any prerequisi= te > for external plugin like m2e... > > Should one use the Eclipse Indigo or the Eclipse Juno? > Should one use the m2e Eclipse plugin or not? > > FA > --=20 Jeff MAURY "Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling. - Bjarne Stroustrup http://www.jeffmaury.com http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com http://www.twitter.com/jeffmaury --f46d044787fb71ec6604d597ee7d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+1 and it looks really re= ally bad on a Mac (terrible UI implementation on Eclipse 4).=A0
<= br>
On my side, I'm stuck with version 3.8.2.=A0
Regards,=A0
Pierre-Arnaud

Le 13 f=E9vr. 2013 =E0 10:3= 5, Jeff MAURY <jeffmaury@jeff= maury.com> a =E9crit=A0:

I would not recommand using Juno as it faces memory leaks and scaling = issues (at least until SR2 is out).
=A0
Regards
Jeff


=A0
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Francis ANDRE = <francis.andre.kampbell@orange.fr> wrote:
Hi

By looking at this page http://directory.apache.org/studio/building.html or the wiki pa= ges at =A0https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/disp= lay/DIRxSTUDIO/Working, I did not found any requirements about t= he Eclipse version for building/running/debugging the Apache Directory Stud= io nor any prerequisite for external plugin like m2e...

Should one use the Eclipse Indigo or the Eclipse Juno?
Should one us= e the m2e Eclipse plugin or not?

FA


--
Jeff MAURY

=
"Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by= actually working and scaling.
=A0- Bjarne Stroustrup

http://www.jeffmaury.com
http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com
http://www.twitt= er.com/jeffmaury=20
--f46d044787fb71ec6604d597ee7d--