directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kiran Ayyagari (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-1659) the apacheds.sh/bat files contains a hard coded revision. This is not good
Date Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:34:07 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13466503#comment-13466503
] 

Kiran Ayyagari commented on DIRSERVER-1659:
-------------------------------------------

so I ask this, should we keep the version number in the artifact's name? If we can drop that(using
<finalName> in pom) this will be easy to solve. 

                
> the apacheds.sh/bat files contains a hard coded revision. This is not good
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRSERVER-1659
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1659
>             Project: Directory ApacheDS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M3
>            Reporter: Emmanuel Lecharny
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 2.0.0-M7
>
>
> Currently, we have hard coded the revision in the two batch files (service/apacheds.sh/bat).
> When we cut a release, we will likely forget to change those versions. They should be
generated while we process the release, before we push the files to the tags directory.
> I don't know if it's possible though... 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message