Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ayaselcuk@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.44 as permitted sender)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ayaselcuk@gmail.com designates
 10.180.85.69 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.85.69;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CADwPi+EczYJ5ZHSQq9S7pCCHF5uCZRBkw7azvV6iFVkEy8qiFw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4F4F9226.1090508@gmail.com>
	<CADwPi+EczYJ5ZHSQq9S7pCCHF5uCZRBkw7azvV6iFVkEy8qiFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 05:02:19 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CALhXAG03K6X6-whuo8ktQX=vir=HAtEqzXPeBh+2_CUq5QpKWA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: DIRSERVER-1663 status with txn branch
From: Selcuk AYA <ayaselcuk@gmail.com>
To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>
Cc: elecharny@apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Alex Karasulu <akarasulu@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Emmanuel L=E9charny <elecharny@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I just tested the txn branch agaist the small concurrent access test I
>> created last september : it seems that with teh fixes Selcuk has injecte=
d
>> ino the code, we don't have any more issue !
>>
>> This is a fantastic news !
>>
>
> Yeah nice work guys.
>
>>
>> Now, that raise a question : should we merge immediately the branch into
>> the trunk, or should we finish the ongoing work in the branch ?
>>
>
> It's up to you guys. Might introduce instability but that might make it
> easier to solidify rapidly and not have to deal with merging.
>

I think we should wait until write commit conflict and logical caches
are handled.
> --
> Best Regards,
> -- Alex
>

thanks
Selcuk