Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 457289FAF for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:14:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5766 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2012 15:14:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 5708 invoked by uid 500); 1 Mar 2012 15:14:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 5700 invoked by uid 99); 1 Mar 2012 15:14:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:14:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.50] (HELO mail-bk0-f50.google.com) (209.85.214.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:14:04 +0000 Received: by bkuw11 with SMTP id w11so826796bku.37 for ; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 07:13:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of elecharny@gmail.com designates 10.205.137.14 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.205.137.14; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of elecharny@gmail.com designates 10.205.137.14 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=elecharny@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elecharny@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.205.137.14]) by 10.205.137.14 with SMTP id im14mr2941578bkc.137.1330614824252 (num_hops = 1); Thu, 01 Mar 2012 07:13:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=57KDJD/E4scSnR0WV98wLQGQ+Ys+2kY+CkV0vFmcW7k=; b=NsRe0SrbBDnia9jXCHxdUqnR6qGRvX2ChXr/QYITYfsPxXqAueE37JYO/Tr1cWIXmH zTVovdJ++5pnwyl/rGsd+dyek2o++5LO5bqQ3c0xqpRqY5knXXkOTbMaxmcz7hP1iRYl JA6nldd7rl19cPI8m183ygujFelsgWi/W2v58= Received: by 10.205.137.14 with SMTP id im14mr2353048bkc.137.1330614824132; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 07:13:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from Emmanuels-MacBook-Pro.local (lon92-10-78-226-4-211.fbx.proxad.net. [78.226.4.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w15sm4186602bku.0.2012.03.01.07.13.43 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 01 Mar 2012 07:13:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4F9226.1090508@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 16:13:42 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?RW1tYW51ZWwgTMOpY2hhcm55?= Reply-To: elecharny@apache.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: DIRSERVER-1663 status with txn branch Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi guys, I just tested the txn branch agaist the small concurrent access test I created last september : it seems that with teh fixes Selcuk has injected ino the code, we don't have any more issue ! This is a fantastic news ! Now, that raise a question : should we merge immediately the branch into the trunk, or should we finish the ongoing work in the branch ? Selcuk, what's your opinion on this ? -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com