On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:59 AM, <elecharny@apache.org> wrote:
Author: elecharny
Date: Thu Feb  2 22:59:08 2012
New Revision: 1239907

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1239907&view=rev
Log:
Fix DIRAPI-76 : new Rdn( "A=a,B=b" ) now throws an LdapInvalidDnException


Should the exception not be ... LdapInvalidNameComponent (we can create one if it does not exist).

Reason I say this is that the whole issue with the non-intuitive constructor was that the API user was thinking the argument can be a multi-component relative distinguished name or a DN. LdapInvalidDnException might not fit here and it might make the user think they have to use a DN rather than a single name component.

WDYT?

--
Best Regards,
-- Alex