directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Karasulu <akaras...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [Studio] Setting the 'Apache Directory LDAP API' as the default network provider
Date Tue, 20 Dec 2011 21:18:00 GMT
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Kiran Ayyagari <kayyagari@apache.org>wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
> <pa@marcelot.net> wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Today, I have introduced a change in the Connection Core plugin of
> Apache Directory Studio to set the 'Apache Directory LDAP API' as the
> default network provider, instead of JNDI.
> >
> > I think it's safe to say that the LDAP API is now a great alternative to
> JNDI.
> > It might still lack a few features here and there, like pulling a schema
> manager from a connection or the lack a connection pool, but from Studio's
> standpoint, each feature we used from JNDI has now an equivalent in the
> LDAP API.
> >
> > I have added a new setting in the 'Connections' preferences page [1]
> where the user can choose its preferred default network provider (either
> 'Apache Directory LDAP API', the default value, or 'JNDI').
> > The user can still decide which network provider to use on a per
> connection basis in the 'New Connection' Wizard page or the 'Connection'
> Properties page [2].
> >
> > I believe this move can give a lot of credit to the LDAP API and help us
> promote it towards the general public. (It might also be helpful in the
> beginning to help find hidden bugs I guess.)
> >
> > WDYT?
> > Should we go in this direction or should we rollback to 'JNDI' as
> default setting?
> >
> +1 to keep the client API as default provider
> thanks Pierre-Arnaud
>
>
Ditto.

-- 
Best Regards,
-- Alex

Mime
View raw message