Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-39337-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 587EE7970
	for <apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:04:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 90932 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2011 14:04:19 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org
Received: (qmail 90899 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2011 14:04:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@directory.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@directory.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@directory.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.directory.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org
Received: (qmail 90892 invoked by uid 99); 18 Oct 2011 14:04:19 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:04:19 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gokturk.gezer@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.213.178 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.213.178] (HELO mail-yx0-f178.google.com)
 (209.85.213.178)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:04:11 +0000
Received: by yxi11 with SMTP id 11so328736yxi.37
        for <dev@directory.apache.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=ywJIJ7HMnOE39njNfQMkOTauMB9o8oAXb95js3GvN5w=;
        b=k2TsD+Kt3CaFM25BmaK48jz4FPKQfcXt6ipOjGp9IVBYpVtmJzxCwA29O+RiS72zrj
         cl0+RU1FGQzTxxXTyykcUFSNhKYX0TlU6+MRP0Aw1FUKvrG3NwCoZkmJ0pTms+O5eQq7
         V0y4W2rfGw8vAW4Gv/Twh7mh1ymHqjBlkSyQI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.29.228 with SMTP id n4mr4501020pbh.23.1318946630578; Tue,
 18 Oct 2011 07:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.43.69 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:03:50 +0300
Message-ID: 
 <CAKjwzkrCnw_EicffbiLBhCQihh68D_XL41PnjrAmXyDSNEk22g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [ApacheDS 2.0] OSGI, Implementing Services
From: =?UTF-8?B?R8O2a3TDvHJrIEdlemVy?= <gokturk.gezer@gmail.com>
To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>,
 elecharny@apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec520ee7764b31a04af933159
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--bcaec520ee7764b31a04af933159
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Emmanuel,

Services can be implement into ApacheDS . Good mix of OSGI itself and IPojo
will let us do everything we wanted to make ApacheDS an OSGI application.

Later changes to the code will make it dependent on OSGI Framework. So i'm
waiting for a branch as we talked. I think, if we apply minor changes to the
branch also, we can avoid merging pain to some degree.

Regards,
Gokturk

--bcaec520ee7764b31a04af933159
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Emmanuel,<div><br></div><div>Services can be implement into ApacheDS . G=
ood mix of OSGI itself and IPojo will let us do everything we wanted to mak=
e ApacheDS an OSGI application.</div><div><br></div><div>Later changes to t=
he code will make it dependent on OSGI Framework. So i&#39;m waiting for a =
branch as we talked. I think, if we apply minor changes to the branch also,=
 we can avoid merging pain to some degree.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Gokturk</div>

--bcaec520ee7764b31a04af933159--