Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 228A7902E for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:01:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88427 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2011 06:01:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 88304 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2011 06:01:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 88287 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2011 06:01:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:01:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.178] (HELO mail-wy0-f178.google.com) (74.125.82.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:01:12 +0000 Received: by wyf28 with SMTP id 28so1552455wyf.37 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:00:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rBcLManbafQt12gscnBkoGl3O/7X1SGq9fX9iUAh32w=; b=WIXTZrHLg6CrfSY430qGeu0Xhl0+sHHDC5NjsWdPObvbyu9GKsegXLsztLvDAdHMq3 kF5kHelZIFSQW7r8oR9tE15VaXyHtubNZJfYlg9NO8yaEAUGPl1BDGLEpDtQZO5dj/Rf HAnODX4tSCyA++VhKuP93UC+aK0S3YjSpF5Z4= Received: by 10.227.23.202 with SMTP id s10mr2030244wbb.85.1319004051082; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:00:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from emmanuel-lecharnys-MacBook-Pro.local ([78.251.125.121]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n21sm7743152wbp.2.2011.10.18.23.00.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:00:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E9E6793.4070502@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:00:51 +0200 From: Emmanuel Lecharny Reply-To: elecharny@apache.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: RDN index, oneLevel and sublevel index merge References: <4E8FED61.5020203@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 10/19/11 12:01 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >> >> >>> I try to update the branch tomorrow, but can't promise anything. >> >> ok, many thanks ! I tested the branch, there are some failing tests in >> core-integ, but had little time to investigate. > Yes, some tests are still failing. For example I observed some kind of > deadlock when recursively deleting entries in a deep nested tree. > > But unfortunately I didn't manage to continue with the branch. I tried > to merge the recent changes from trunk but come conflicts occured. I > think it doesn't make sense to continue for me because due the the > high trunk activity it takes too much time to merge in the trunk > changes. Yeah, unfortunatly, we have had to move around a hell lot of packages in order to do the OSGi changes. I think it's now stabilizing, but we probably will continue in this area for a few more days, so it's better not to try to merge anything yet. -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com