From dev-return-39378-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org Thu Oct 20 06:10:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 76FD676FE for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 06:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18756 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2011 06:10:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 18560 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2011 06:10:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 18532 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2011 06:10:05 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 06:10:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO emmanuel-lecharnys-MacBook-Pro.local) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username elecharny, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 06:10:02 +0000 Message-ID: <4E9FBB38.6090008@apache.org> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:10:00 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?RW1tYW51ZWwgTMOpY2hhcm55?= Reply-To: elecharny@apache.org Organization: The Apache Software Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: [API] Experimenting OSGI fragments to solve the extensibility issue References: <-5308071789035679513@unknownmsgid> <4E9F5454.6020906@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 10/20/11 3:48 AM, Göktürk Gezer wrote: > Hi Emmanuel,Pierre > > I just attached my current work on Comparators to #DIRSERVER-1672. So here > is the explanation of how it works and how we can improve. > > Because both issues i asked are ambigious. I decided to keep them both. I > mean Comparators are not shared and their OID is also assignable. Just some insight about why Compartor's OID can be assigned : they are associated with the MatchingRules, which have a unique OID. But the thing is that a Comparator can be used by more than one MatchingRule. In this case, the Comparator will inherit its OID from the MatchingRule it is associated with. -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com