Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E391B46F6 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 11:37:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21535 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2011 11:37:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 21330 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2011 11:37:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 21323 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2011 11:37:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:37:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of pajbam@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.47] (HELO mail-fx0-f47.google.com) (209.85.161.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:37:08 +0000 Received: by fxg11 with SMTP id 11so3517249fxg.34 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 04:36:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=othiXePmqEQHJ4x9bwQmlD8i1fWZlE3J0sY2L0jUuVo=; b=GFwBiZZp862M8Ylha4C8QUmvN4dkVbmSNPwJSSHjwty1jbhbWlk2e/D/XLFxgtukLi jmamcGiMaflW5GZPYfnivDZ10DeQMsGysPkPIvqueFWQMyyboJiIATHhq6KS6TOrujZi /JUEXpezhsxINZiyvJapXBBuOzXx34g+EpTP8= Received: by 10.223.72.15 with SMTP id k15mr1353064faj.107.1309520208445; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 04:36:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.52] (lon92-10-78-226-4-211.fbx.proxad.net [78.226.4.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n7sm2291571fam.43.2011.07.01.04.36.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 01 Jul 2011 04:36:47 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [ApacheDS] Build issue and Java 5 compatibility (Fwd: Build failed in Jenkins: dir-apacheds-jdk15-ubuntu-deploy #310) From: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 13:36:45 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <40921057.9081309406953883.JavaMail.hudson@aegis> <4E0C450E.9090103@gmail.com> To: "Apache Directory Developers List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org How about launching a more formal vote about this ? I think such an important change deserves a real 72 hours vote. Kiran suggested me on IM that we also take some feedback from users via = a notice mail on the users ML. I think it's a very good idea and we should do that prior to the vote. Lastly, we've seen that moving ApacheDS to Java 6 only implicates that = Studio should do the same. What about the LDAP API ? There's no technical reason to move it to Java 6 only, except the fact = that we want to unify all our sub-projects. WDYT? Regards, Pierre-Arnaud On 30 juin 2011, at 15:23, Alex Karasulu wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny = wrote: >=20 > SNIP ... >=20 >>> I see too possible workarounds: >>> - we switch back to a version of ActiveMQ still compiled using Java = 5 >>> - we move our compilation for ApacheDS from Java 5 to Java 6 >>> (This also implicitly indicates that we will do the same for = Studio as >>> it depends on the latest version of ApacheDS) >>>=20 >>> What are your thoughts about this? >>=20 >> Let's get rid of Java 5. >=20 > +1 >=20 > Regards, > Alex