Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of akarasulu@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.44 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: akarasulu@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <4E0EAD31.4020009@gmail.com>
References: <4E0EAD31.4020009@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 10:27:15 +0300
Message-ID: <BANLkTimqhEKjJ8X73Ud+jw_BZyFGZ4GC7w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Reverse table removal : status
From: Alex Karasulu <akarasulu@apache.org>
To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>,
 elecharny@apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks for the update.

> - There is most certainly some work to be done in the SearchEngine class, as
> we won't be able to use the revert table, we will use sets intersection
> instead

What does this mean, "the revert table, we will use sets intersection instead"?

> So all in all, it seems that it's going to work, with increased performances
> for add, delete, move, rename and modify operations, as we will have twice
> less data to update on disk. The Search and Lookup operations should be as
> fast, and even a bit faster, some operations on the RDN index have been
> improved.

Can't wait to play with it. Plus this will be simpler and less
confusing without the forward and reverse reference we have to keep in
our heads when dealing with the indices. The SPI will also shrink in
Partition.

> In the man time, I also fixed some nasty bugs in the DN and Ava classes.
> Good side effects...
>
> I hope to be done by the end of next week.

Sounds great. Thanks for the update.

Regards,
Alex