Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-38505-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AC83462F
	for <apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Fri,  1 Jul 2011 11:14:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 96840 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2011 11:14:23 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org
Received: (qmail 96626 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2011 11:14:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@directory.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@directory.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@directory.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.directory.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org
Received: (qmail 96612 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2011 11:14:18 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:14:18 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pajbam@gmail.com designates
 209.85.161.47 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.161.47] (HELO mail-fx0-f47.google.com) (209.85.161.47)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:14:11 +0000
Received: by fxg11 with SMTP id 11so3498878fxg.34
        for <dev@directory.apache.org>; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 04:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=sender:from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date
         :message-id:to:mime-version:x-mailer;
        bh=bKT+anOFUrckNHoIduT5IuBHQQUuCrhXAaGGZizbUPA=;
        b=vEJLwAX4XGi9FBEkzaxz0mjjrS3pdxkwVvJ2kJdNHejFH/YdNWrrtw+Hk1iFYWIsJg
         wCX6W1xyZPhiBlb+Jwb0IJ8sZ9cUF44knOHIMWnnZs0620i3uC1+aLIFpvMFlP0Ydx+x
         snmu76/+ReBXw+TOSK8DyilbOFhEKqoieCxWY=
Received: by 10.223.1.201 with SMTP id 9mr4618424fag.91.1309518830073;
        Fri, 01 Jul 2011 04:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.52] (lon92-10-78-226-4-211.fbx.proxad.net
 [78.226.4.211])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o23sm2283989faa.9.2011.07.01.04.13.48
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 01 Jul 2011 04:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pajbam@gmail.com>
From: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa@marcelot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [VOTE] Should we merge the DIRSHARED and DIRAPI spaces in JIRA into a
 single one?
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 13:13:46 +0200
Message-Id: <7A6F83D7-B0F2-4749-BE4F-3F4516B9488B@marcelot.net>
To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)

Having done some cleaning in both JIRA spaces this morning, I'm really =
wondering if those two shouldn't be merged.

Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 - Merge the DIRSHARED and DIRAPI spaces in JIRA
[ ]  0 - Abstain
[ ] -1 - Do NOT merge the DIRSHARED and DIRAPI spaces in JIRA

Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud=