Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Message-ID: <4E2755AD.6010508@apache.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:24:45 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?RW1tYW51ZWwgTMOpY2hhcm55?= <elecharny@apache.org>
Reply-To: elecharny@apache.org
Organization: The Apache Software Foundation
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6;
 rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Partitions Heads up : resent with correct formating for the
 hierarchies
References: <4E270C91.3020205@gmail.com>
 <CAPz8h_XKRhoeApR+K5X-FXLBuuv-BAXQFSw6BKzvubbDhPeqpQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPz8h_XKRhoeApR+K5X-FXLBuuv-BAXQFSw6BKzvubbDhPeqpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 7/20/11 8:50 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
> Sounds all reasonable. The only thing that bugs me is that the
> hierarchy gets bigger, I think of "Composition over Inheritance". But
> I have no real argument against your proposal.
I have still to think about the PartitionNexus interface, I'm not 100% 
convinced it should extend the Partition interface.
>
> One open question: in your final class hierarchy there are two
> abstract classes in a row: AbstractBTreePartition and
> AbstractXdbmPartition: I think it should be possbile to merge them
> too, isn't it?
yes, but atm, I'm trying to get the tests passing before going any further.

There are some few things I haven't talked about :
- SchemaService class should disappear. It's useless
- I was thinking about merging the initialize() and doInit() methods
- all of what I'm currently doing has one purpose : being able to 
simplify the init phase in order to be ready for OSGi


-- 
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com