From dev-return-38531-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org Tue Jul 5 07:51:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E4304E6E for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 07:51:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10803 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2011 07:51:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 10344 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jul 2011 07:51:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 10319 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jul 2011 07:50:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 07:50:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of pajbam@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.47] (HELO mail-fx0-f47.google.com) (209.85.161.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 07:50:47 +0000 Received: by fxg11 with SMTP id 11so6517725fxg.34 for ; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:50:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:content-type:subject:date:message-id:cc:to:mime-version :x-mailer; bh=DlhG5kEEk+urIIkkFMSVnyKwFCq+WE/GysFOCnLF6Oc=; b=uYKNwbvGnN4P3zeT4vjxrJIFuqF+k6NPLcjm1HXL3WzYnVasK/ZlmfBHI4VU2CCjPr wqZchhLbo6dv1rcAP1Q57OrSmYo8kBBC1NfDTl08riNzIsobJyTitAQoCukcObjLzWGi JBuHBjQF1qgDC44wrHYfBWAaJL62sTs9m1XZY= Received: by 10.223.10.150 with SMTP id p22mr10842230fap.86.1309852226894; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:50:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (def92-4-82-225-58-213.fbx.proxad.net [82.225.58.213]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e16sm5089401fak.41.2011.07.05.00.50.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:50:26 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot From: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1-832541954 Subject: [VOTE] [ApacheDS] [Studio] Moving compilation target to Java 6 Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 09:50:23 +0200 Message-Id: Cc: users@directory.apache.org To: Apache Directory Developers List Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-1-832541954 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi Dev and Users, Following our previous mail threads on the Dev and Notifications MLs = [1][2][3], here's a more formal vote on moving our compilation target to = Java 6 for ApacheDS and Apache Directory Studio sub-projects of the = Apache Directory project. I believe it is not necessary to move the Apache LDAP API requirements = to Java 6 at the moment. Please cast your votes: [ ] +1 - Move compilation target to Java 6 for ApacheDS and Apache = Directory Studio sub-projects [ ] 0 - Abstain [ ] -1 - Do NOT move compilation target to Java 6 for ApacheDS and = Apache Directory Studio sub-projects NOTE: The users ML is included in the loop in order to make users aware = of our willing to change our JVM compatibility and allow them to give us = some feedback (if needed). Regards, Pierre-Arnaud [1] - = http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/directory-notifications/201106.mb= ox/%3C1233574608.2831308888454913.JavaMail.hudson@aegis%3E [2] - http://markmail.org/message/mem5ky3pp2gm35gf [3] - http://apache.markmail.org/thread/6crhlt2feqydv6kf= --Apple-Mail-1-832541954 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Hi = Dev and Users,

Following our previous mail threads on = the Dev and Notifications MLs [1][2][3], here's a more formal vote on = moving our compilation target to Java 6 for ApacheDS and Apache = Directory Studio sub-projects of the Apache Directory = project.
I believe it is not necessary to move the Apache LDAP = API requirements to Java 6 at the = moment.

Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 - = Move compilation target to Java 6 for ApacheDS and Apache Directory = Studio sub-projects
[ ]  0 - Abstain
[ ] -1 - Do NOT move = compilation target to Java 6 for ApacheDS and Apache Directory = Studio sub-projects

NOTE: The users ML is = included in the loop in order to make users aware of our willing to = change our JVM compatibility and allow them to give us some feedback (if = needed).

Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud

= --Apple-Mail-1-832541954--