From dev-return-38583-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org Fri Jul 8 08:24:40 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 119126DAE for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 08:24:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95551 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2011 08:24:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 95146 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2011 08:24:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 95126 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2011 08:24:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 08:24:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of pajbam@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.47] (HELO mail-fx0-f47.google.com) (209.85.161.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 08:24:11 +0000 Received: by fxg11 with SMTP id 11so2048911fxg.34 for ; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 01:23:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:mime-version:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to:to :references:message-id:x-mailer; bh=oQnhiu/kkPHQe9RFIATCmcjj5Y0Sow887xBoUlLoWgU=; b=vynl+39qt0YUJfx8lGqS/fQBuZzMC82ORMiPYozCDw2aHz+0FWWeTz7VdFcT6XEt2G 9Bc+olcS9zWLY9PKX+vlYkP377J6ARf1FvwW2YAGA+CuFs6jQuDFN23tIrb10GVe77FT +ya+qJZ/V6A1uE+OwERrKRFXgafgsGQclhRPk= Received: by 10.223.6.198 with SMTP id a6mr2678450faa.130.1310113431383; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 01:23:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (def92-4-82-225-58-213.fbx.proxad.net [82.225.58.213]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b3sm7230771fao.44.2011.07.08.01.23.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 08 Jul 2011 01:23:50 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot From: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1--1053738042 Subject: [VOTE] [RESULTS] [ApacheDS] [Studio] Moving compilation target to Java 6 Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 10:23:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: To: Apache Directory Developers List , users@directory.apache.org References: Message-Id: <25B9B323-E96A-4CEA-8F58-F19EBA948F6E@marcelot.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-1--1053738042 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi Dev and Users, It is now time to close this vote. Here are the results:=20 - Six +1 binding votes: - Emmanuel L=E9charny - Kiran Ayyagari - Alex Karasulu - Felix Knecht - Stefan Seelmann - Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot - One +1 non-binding vote: - Jim Willeke - No =B10 or -1 votes I'm going to update both Apache DS and Studio project pom files. I will also check our CI builds (if they use Java 5 to compile the = projects). Hopefully, by the end of the day the all CI builds should be back to a = green light... :) Thanks! Pierre-Arnaud On 5 juil. 2011, at 09:50, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote: > Hi Dev and Users, >=20 > Following our previous mail threads on the Dev and Notifications MLs = [1][2][3], here's a more formal vote on moving our compilation target to = Java 6 for ApacheDS and Apache Directory Studio sub-projects of the = Apache Directory project. > I believe it is not necessary to move the Apache LDAP API requirements = to Java 6 at the moment. >=20 > Please cast your votes: > [ ] +1 - Move compilation target to Java 6 for ApacheDS and Apache = Directory Studio sub-projects > [ ] 0 - Abstain > [ ] -1 - Do NOT move compilation target to Java 6 for ApacheDS and = Apache Directory Studio sub-projects >=20 > NOTE: The users ML is included in the loop in order to make users = aware of our willing to change our JVM compatibility and allow them to = give us some feedback (if needed). >=20 > Regards, > Pierre-Arnaud >=20 > [1] - = http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/directory-notifications/201106.mb= ox/%3C1233574608.2831308888454913.JavaMail.hudson@aegis%3E > [2] - http://markmail.org/message/mem5ky3pp2gm35gf > [3] - http://apache.markmail.org/thread/6crhlt2feqydv6kf --Apple-Mail-1--1053738042 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Hi Dev and = Users,
It is now time to close = this vote.

Here are the = results: 
- Six = +1 binding votes:
    - Kiran Ayyagari
    - Alex = Karasulu
    - = Felix Knecht
    - Pierre-Arnaud = Marcelot
- One +1 non-binding = vote:
   =  - Jim Willeke
- No = =B10 or -1 votes
I'm going to update both = Apache DS and Studio project pom files.
I will also check our CI builds (if they use Java 5 = to compile the projects).
Thanks!
Hi Dev and = Users,

Following our previous mail threads on the Dev = and Notifications MLs [1][2][3], here's a more formal vote on moving our = compilation target to Java 6 for ApacheDS and Apache Directory Studio = sub-projects of the Apache Directory project.
I believe it is = not necessary to move the Apache LDAP API requirements to Java 6 at the = moment.

Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 - = Move compilation target to Java 6 for ApacheDS and Apache Directory = Studio sub-projects
[ ]  0 - Abstain
[ ] -1 - Do NOT move = compilation target to Java 6 for ApacheDS and Apache Directory = Studio sub-projects

NOTE: The users ML is = included in the loop in order to make users aware of our willing to = change our JVM compatibility and allow them to give us some feedback (if = needed).

Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud

= --Apple-Mail-1--1053738042--