directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot ...@marcelot.net>
Subject Re: [Shared] DN value for schema modification entry
Date Thu, 07 Jul 2011 11:08:06 GMT
Thanks.

I think I only looked at the Dev list archives.

Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud

On 7 juil. 2011, at 12:43, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa@marcelot.net> wrote:
>> On 7 juil. 2011, at 11:37, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:
>> 
>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa@marcelot.net>
wrote:
>>>> Is this modifications storing feature even working?
>>>> From what I've seen in the code, it looks more like a placeholder and the
>>>> feature is still waiting for implementation...
>>>> I couldn't find where Studio was depending on it, Kiran. Can you give me
>>>> some pointers, please?
>>> I remember Seelmann mentioning on ML that studio depends on this DN to
>>> update the cached schema, but this
>>> feature is not working due to an issue on server ( I believe it was
>>> working at one point of time but was broken later)
>> 
>> AFAIR, the cached schema of a connection in the LDAP Browser plugin is read from
the DN provided via the 'subschemaSubentry' AT of the RootDSE entry.
>> I looked in my ML mails archive but couldn't find a related discussion about the
usage of "cn=schemaModifications,ou=schema" in that area.
>> 
> this has some details about it http://markmail.org/thread/tx37zeusdtye3nbo
>> Anyways, it might be a good time to do this as you mentioned.
>> IMO, it shouldn't have a huge impact on Studio.
>> 
> yeah am gonna fix this
>> Regards,
>> Pierre-Arnaud
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Pierre-Arnaud
>>>> 
>>>> On 6 juil. 2011, at 23:15, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> had thought about this earlier but studio depends on this DN so didn't do
>>>> that, now is perhaps the right time to do it for version 2.0 of both
>>>> 
>>>> On 07-Jul-2011 12:34 AM, "Emmanuel Lecharny" <elecharny@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 7/6/11 7:49 PM, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> hello guys,
>>>>> 
>>>>>   We currently have an entry with DN cn...
>>>> 
>>>> IMO, the best would be to have a special AT injected into the ou=schema
>>>> entry, instead of having a dedicated entry to store the very same
>>>> information. It would solve the issue quite efficientely.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Cordialement,
>>>> Emmanuel L├ęcharny
>>>> www.iktek.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Kiran Ayyagari
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Kiran Ayyagari


Mime
View raw message