Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com designates
 209.85.161.47 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4E0AF69E.403@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:55:42 +0200
From: Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com>
Reply-To: elecharny@apache.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>
Subject: Re: SubLevel index questions
References: <4E0AF28C.4050607@gmail.com>
 <BANLkTim6J39H+LxCXwOTNaVZcghroZGLiA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTim6J39H+LxCXwOTNaVZcghroZGLiA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 6/29/11 11:52 AM, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:
> everything is correct except that we don't add any entries for RootDSE
> i.e tuples with 0L
> e.x if we search on RootDSE with sublevel scope *all* entries are
> implicitly qualified as children
>       making subLevel index unnecessary for lookup

Ahhh, stupid me, of course !

So at the end, the SubLevel index should be :

<1L, 1L>
<1L, 2L>
<1L, 3L>
<1L, 4L>
<2L, 2L>
<2L, 3L>
<2L, 4L>
<3L, 3L>
<3L, 4L>
<4L, 4L>

right ?


-- 
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com