Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08B6A4CEC for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22401 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 12:03:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 22369 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jun 2011 12:03:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 22362 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jun 2011 12:03:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:03:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.178] (HELO mail-wy0-f178.google.com) (74.125.82.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:03:04 +0000 Received: by wya21 with SMTP id 21so2830542wya.37 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 05:02:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/+l9EOddqsltipq/mGos3BP+T4cNw0WUSj844QMN6m8=; b=cQ9u3k/vEAHm0AEaWpeTpP8a8VAMoYjeXxnE9IuQmPtN6clEXPMJjbGx3DHmsYoENB 1vlgpfKvj77Ehan78clTp9w22w1jjo7zBR7PlY25/JWtMi3gx9mCvWcsn8mZLfwwebTh ym3sdiRPfricJvnPSxWWPGL8USRYSspP1cs/E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GOwyqOCOyg8IVC3f7sRQ4FLjQikRMwtDqcc0ufxf+fuVZmp97Cf3Q9toSzGAVbW9uj oIJUKCczst56/+H/5lgHCdmmEIkRnlwpCV6QUYUV4xCB1Je6Pj5OG18j6Q1AA9TbGeWa HO10lEb4PvAypYL/ZknhbI0lj08FKdSln/zyI= Received: by 10.216.88.66 with SMTP id z44mr13852wee.108.1308657762480; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 05:02:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from emmanuel-lecharnys-MacBook-Pro.local (lon92-10-78-226-4-211.fbx.proxad.net [78.226.4.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g2sm3433481weg.14.2011.06.21.05.02.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 21 Jun 2011 05:02:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E00885F.9080600@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:02:39 +0200 From: Emmanuel Lecharny Reply-To: elecharny@apache.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Starting to cut a 2.0.0-M1 release Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi guys, I'm just back from a long week-end, and it's hard to start hacking deeply on the current trunks, because that means a lot of changes in it. (I'm currently working on aliases, and we have many issues) I will branch the current trunk into a branches/2.0.0-M1, create the tarballs, and launch a vote for a 2.0.0-M1 release as soon as I have the tarballs ready. Keep in mind that this 2.0.0-M1 is *just* a milestone, nothing more, nothing less. I'm not even sure we should advertize it, but some of our user base is waiting for very important bug fixes (mainly the ACI reload issue : when the server is stopped, the ACI aren't reloaded at startup, which makes the server unusable. It has been fixed 3 weeks ago). It's also an opportunity for people who want to get familiar with the new configuration to play with it for real. I don't really mind wasting half a day on such a task if any of you think it's not a good idea to release this week, as it's also a perfect opportunity to check the release process for free, so feel comfortable to tell me to revert the branch. Thanks guys ! -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com