Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4DF1E122.7020009@apache.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:17:22 +0200
From: Felix Knecht <felixk@apache.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc15 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Seriously thinking about curring a release next week.
References: <4DF1B6DA.5090708@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DF1B6DA.5090708@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 06/10/2011 08:16 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> we already discussed this topic two weeks ago, but now, I think we should really move on.
>
> Yesterday, I did a bug parade and started to fix issues. We have now 197 of 301 issues fixed, which is a HUGE number
> of fixed issues. Add to that the fact we released LDAP-API 1.0.0-M4 last week, and that we have some serious features
> to add in the near future (administrative model, server OSGification, Replication), I'm keen to get the M1 milestone
> out asap.
>
> Note that I'm not pushing this release because we need it, but just because we need a stabilized base to work on. It
> worked wonderfully on the LDAP-API code base, with 4 releaes those past 5 months, and this is really a good feeling to
> see the progression every month when you do small steps instead of waiting for a giant leap.
>
> I'll try to get as much issues fixed as possible in the next 3 days, and may be we can start considering a release at
> the beginning of next week?
>
> thoughts ?
>
+1 Release early, release often

Thanks and regards
Felix