directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Lecharny <>
Subject Re: SubLevel index questions
Date Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:55:42 GMT
On 6/29/11 11:52 AM, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:
> everything is correct except that we don't add any entries for RootDSE
> i.e tuples with 0L
> e.x if we search on RootDSE with sublevel scope *all* entries are
> implicitly qualified as children
>       making subLevel index unnecessary for lookup

Ahhh, stupid me, of course !

So at the end, the SubLevel index should be :

<1L, 1L>
<1L, 2L>
<1L, 3L>
<1L, 4L>
<2L, 2L>
<2L, 3L>
<2L, 4L>
<3L, 3L>
<3L, 4L>
<4L, 4L>

right ?

Emmanuel L├ęcharny

View raw message