From dev-return-38072-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org Tue May 17 13:29:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA4854295 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 13:29:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48345 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 13:29:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 48307 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2011 13:29:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 48300 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2011 13:29:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 13:29:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of akarasulu@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.42] (HELO mail-ww0-f42.google.com) (74.125.82.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 13:29:48 +0000 Received: by wwk4 with SMTP id 4so3593238wwk.1 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 06:29:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=h6YWyQJg3996v+s6QhMZMMECMAVFDsFJBvE/n8jXIFA=; b=GrJtYGKEHjlfd0TRaRoEY1AwfIkhg/SJQ0/9DoHKf1RovXLOR3ritw+WMp9cuG3tEt DJS0QxXXe5A93RIZQ5WmNgqSXkuaIdVBwAONuB+JbLwri6k0/2GtshQ2cB7+ZqUVntVM rSYBW52lKxn2tP9DWbG0ZLJpx1b1gCowclMvc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=bYrVOAtLcSY68nqL8FZeGo5TJWCMWkQ4370PvrbajTBttQ9aM/emb/f5j26WVUlXo5 qtHEAy+L3NQZ3jBIpH0xRvXxsN5HCTGDlmMUFSUVumt9VjRz1HzcdWc/DVKySX7tnj2p umq54pOpVDPFqzx0OgdIsZkRPigSdjjjLuU0Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.65.203 with SMTP id f53mr3747104wed.54.1305638968592; Tue, 17 May 2011 06:29:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: akarasulu@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.37.11 with HTTP; Tue, 17 May 2011 06:29:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DD15156.5030303@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 16:29:28 +0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: cM9WT3CSdcutpEdytR_T_2xdX0E Message-ID: Subject: Re: Experiment about extension points OSGi/ClassLoading initialization From: Alex Karasulu To: Apache Directory Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0ce0b4eaed8bf204a378c265 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0ce0b4eaed8bf204a378c265 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Kiran Ayyagari wrote: > can we use a set of package names as input rather than individual > class names. I know it is a bit more work, but makes is a lot easier > to > configure and less input statements. > > +1 > not very urgent to have it now, we can change the way controls are > detected later, just wanted to know if there are any known limitations > that prevent > using package names. > > Don't think there should be issues with this. Basically we can search the package to see if there are classes implementing the required interfaces. Regards, -Alex --000e0ce0b4eaed8bf204a378c265 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:36 PM, Kiran A= yyagari <kayya= gari@apache.org> wrote:
can we use a set of package names as input rather than individual
class names. I know it is a bit more work, but makes is a lot easier
to
configure and less input statements.


+1
=A0
not very urgent to have it now, we can change the way controls are
detected later, just wanted to know if there are any known limitations
that prevent
using package names.


Don't think there should be issues with this. Basically we can = search the package to see if there are classes implementing the required in= terfaces.

Regards,
-Alex
--000e0ce0b4eaed8bf204a378c265--