directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kiran Ayyagari (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-1619) Rdn is not required to be stored in ServerEntrySerializer
Date Tue, 17 May 2011 19:13:48 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034986#comment-13034986
] 

Kiran Ayyagari commented on DIRSERVER-1619:
-------------------------------------------

Seelmann's recommendation is valid and IMO very important to consider from recovery pov. This
makes recovery very easy with just master table alone. 
But in order to achieve this we must include the parent's ID as an operational attribute inside
the Entry, otherwise there is no easy way that
the serialization layer has access to the Entry's parent ID.

> Rdn is not required to be stored in ServerEntrySerializer
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRSERVER-1619
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1619
>             Project: Directory ApacheDS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.7
>            Reporter: Rajesh
>            Assignee: Kiran Ayyagari
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0-M1
>
>
> In ServerEntrySerializer Rdn is also being serialzied. And when we are trying to lookup
Entry from the AbstractTable, we are not using the Rdn or even the Entry to construct the
Dn. Dn is being constructed using Rdn Table. 
> So it will improve performance a bit if we don't save the Rdn at all.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message