directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kiran Ayyagari (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-1619) Rdn is not required to be stored in ServerEntrySerializer
Date Tue, 17 May 2011 13:24:47 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13034755#comment-13034755
] 

Kiran Ayyagari commented on DIRSERVER-1619:
-------------------------------------------

This is a very valid observation, we can do this optimization BUT I can't recollect why exactly
I have kept the RDN in the Entry while implementing the
RdnIndex. Am trying to find it, but haven't found anything tangible so far.

> Rdn is not required to be stored in ServerEntrySerializer
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRSERVER-1619
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1619
>             Project: Directory ApacheDS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.7
>            Reporter: Rajesh
>            Priority: Minor
>
> In ServerEntrySerializer Rdn is also being serialzied. And when we are trying to lookup
Entry from the AbstractTable, we are not using the Rdn or even the Entry to construct the
Dn. Dn is being constructed using Rdn Table. 
> So it will improve performance a bit if we don't save the Rdn at all.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message