directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot ...@marcelot.net>
Subject Re: Should I remove unused constructors in Entry ?
Date Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:35:30 GMT
On 11 avr. 2011, at 14:30, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:

> Hi Pierre-Arnaud,
> 
>    yeah, back then I was only searching for a method with name
> *has*Attribute(), so thought it didn't exist.
>    Later Emmanuel told me about the *contains*Attribute(),

Oh, ok. Héhé. :)

>    P.S:- I would prefer both methods to start with either 'contains'
> or 'has' , just to avoid confusion, but no big deal.

That thing kind of confused me too. I agree with you completely.

Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud


> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa@marcelot.net> wrote:
>> Hi Kiran,
>> I think we already have equivalent methods for this.
>> It's just not called 'hasAttributeType' but 'contains( [multiple arguments]
>> )' and 'containsAttribute( AttributeType attributeType )'.
>> Is it was you were looking for?
>> Regards,
>> Pierre-Arnaud
>> 
>> On 6 avr. 2011, at 20:50, Kiran Ayyagari wrote:
>> 
>> sorry accidentlly pressed send button, so am thinking that it would be good
>> to have hasAttributetype() similar to hasObjectclass()
>> 
>> On 07-Apr-2011 12:14 AM, "Kiran Ayyagari" <kayyagari@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> +1 to delete, l don't think they are widely used. OTOH i think we should
>> have another method to check the presence of attributetyp
>> 
>>> 
>>> On 06-Apr-2011 10:57 PM, "Emmanuel Lecharny" <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi guys,
>>> 
>>> as I...
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Kiran Ayyagari


Mime
View raw message