Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37020 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2011 18:55:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2011 18:55:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 23977 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 18:55:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 23917 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2011 18:55:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 23910 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2011 18:55:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:55:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of pajbam@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.44] (HELO mail-ww0-f44.google.com) (74.125.82.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:55:28 +0000 Received: by wwa36 with SMTP id 36so986722wwa.1 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 10:55:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:from:mime-version:content-type:subject :date:in-reply-to:to:references:message-id:x-mailer; bh=poRWTAsKohVWLW8kvekqMWnoFlwuMO6XKN50YocOi1I=; b=LXxV+6hPtVdwcTJyYhx7QQrma0OuUdZVhAbYbsBa//+dh8aeEdVpbQtf2mUgaSE7/Q tinBZIcDg5id+xVlWbm+PbhxLVCz2iKAGtAffHvNFCU9dkKilVBQBdW6bk4Trhs1T7St RSHz2DKLeR9a4iXzcM61pOS6pyS0FuCBGYGW0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:mime-version:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to:to :references:message-id:x-mailer; b=rkRnpAPrZezZWMF6SjwOm0Xoom5T3J8jYCNj1W1H0s+GAv5NQfd3P4akPrswqTIW3Y 4qQcFz5kJ2MLlIObQPR9EzY2cn0iPeMEleeIjY4Gdaz4rSL2FhQNy9SZ1BySGUI9NOd+ bMONbBT8EcURXfXB3IoLFg9kxqUohimbHLzsM= Received: by 10.216.71.209 with SMTP id r59mr5785133wed.15.1299696908226; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 10:55:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.52] (lon92-10-78-226-4-211.fbx.proxad.net [78.226.4.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b54sm1067317wer.45.2011.03.09.10.55.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 Mar 2011 10:55:06 -0800 (PST) Sender: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot From: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-123--732841937 Subject: Re: [Shared] Is it time for the M2 release? Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 19:55:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: To: "Apache Directory Developers List" References: <10769D06-B43B-4141-9D3B-5C05CA6E1DE9@marcelot.net> <054BD58D-80B9-4487-A33F-2895BB82C9F7@marcelot.net> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail-123--732841937 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Ok guys, I think I fixed most of the required issues before the release of M2. I still have a couple of PMD errors to fix and see the = 'shared-ldap-client-all' issue. I might be able to start a release tomorrow in the afternoon. Regards, Pierre-Arnaud On 8 mars 2011, at 09:50, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > Please see DIRSHARED-99 and DIRSHARED-100. >=20 > On Mar 8, 2011 9:18 AM, "Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot" = wrote: > > Hi Stefan, > >=20 > > On 7 mars 2011, at 22:11, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > >=20 > >> Sure. > >>=20 > >> I wanted to fix the legal issues, but I think I won't have time to > >> work on it before next weekend, and event then I'm not sure, sorry. > >=20 > > Do you remember what kind of issues it was? > > I thought we had already fixed legal issues with the release of M1 = and the various additions of 3rd parties licenses and attributions in = the Notice files. > >=20 > >> Another thing to check is that the distribution packages include = all > >> dependencies. > >=20 > > Yeah, that's also something I wanted to test before the release. = Especially a standard logging implementation like Log4J (letting the = ability to be replaced by another specific implementation if users = prefer some other). > >=20 > >> A last thing is that I'm confused about that new > >> shared-ldap-client-all module which shades lot of shared modules = but > >> also 3rd party dependencies. I don't see what it is good for. > >=20 > > I agree, shading all shared modules is a good idea but I'm not so = sure about 3rd parties dependencies too. > > I guess the resulting jar should contain "shared"-only classes. > >=20 > > I'll look into that if it's ok with everyone. > >=20 > > Regards, > > Pierre-Arnaud > >=20 > >=20 > >> Kind regards > >> Stefan > >>=20 > >>=20 > >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot = wrote: > >>> Hi guys, > >>>=20 > >>> I was just wondering it wouldn't be a good time to schedule the M2 = release. > >>>=20 > >>> Heavy refactoring have been done since the last M1 milestone, = trunk is pretty stable now and the current activity is pretty low. > >>>=20 > >>> Before starting a new phase of heavy coding, it might be a good = idea to get the M2 release in the hands of our users. > >>>=20 > >>> WDYT? > >>>=20 > >>> Regards, > >>> Pierre-Arnaud > >>>=20 > >>>=20 > >>>=20 > >>>=20 > >=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail-123--732841937 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Ok guys,

I think I fixed most of the required issues before the release of M2.

I still have a couple of PMD errors to fix and see the 'shared-ldap-client-all' issue.

I might be able to start a release tomorrow in the afternoon.

Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud

On 8 mars 2011, at 09:50, Stefan Seelmann wrote:

Please see DIRSHARED-99 and DIRSHARED-100.

On Mar 8, 2011 9:18 AM, "Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot" <pa@marcelot.net> wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On 7 mars 2011, at 22:11, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
>
>> Sure.
>>
>> I wanted to fix the legal issues, but I think I won't have time to
>> work on it before next weekend, and event then I'm not sure, sorry.
>
> Do you remember what kind of issues it was?
> I thought we had already fixed legal issues with the release of M1 and the various additions of 3rd parties licenses and attributions in the Notice files.
>
>> Another thing to check is that the distribution packages include all
>> dependencies.
>
> Yeah, that's also something I wanted to test before the release. Especially a standard logging implementation like Log4J (letting the ability to be replaced by another specific implementation if users prefer some other).
>
>> A last thing is that I'm confused about that new
>> shared-ldap-client-all module which shades lot of shared modules but
>> also 3rd party dependencies. I don't see what it is good for.
>
> I agree, shading all shared modules is a good idea but I'm not so sure about 3rd parties dependencies too.
> I guess the resulting jar should contain "shared"-only classes.
>
> I'll look into that if it's ok with everyone.
>
> Regards,
> Pierre-Arnaud
>
>
>> Kind regards
>> Stefan
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa@marcelot.net> wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> I was just wondering it wouldn't be a good time to schedule the M2 release.
>>>
>>> Heavy refactoring have been done since the last M1 milestone, trunk is pretty stable now and the current activity is pretty low.
>>>
>>> Before starting a new phase of heavy coding, it might be a good idea to get the M2 release in the hands of our users.
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Pierre-Arnaud
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>


--Apple-Mail-123--732841937--