Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 67845 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2011 15:41:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Mar 2011 15:41:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 41211 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 15:41:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 41106 invoked by uid 500); 10 Mar 2011 15:41:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 41098 invoked by uid 99); 10 Mar 2011 15:41:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:41:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pajbam@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.178] (HELO mail-wy0-f178.google.com) (74.125.82.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:41:16 +0000 Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so1855552wyj.37 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 07:40:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:from:mime-version:content-type:subject :date:in-reply-to:to:references:message-id:x-mailer; bh=6MbuTILQZ1EAswcLIjXKGWY/lk4+ik45Ee+FAnHCtlQ=; b=MoPfH049O720p8ESV1rGhpmKjfLVgjaypbDeK8fFtm3C+Te9GEFMmNJHPW8lXnLqxU NRgj3mszkIPsvcqDR0Pp22x80cjWIXEaIQy/p+NpEm+SrPId/TW/kIFMDPfoiNFt/aVt RHtVDlE/kZypm69N17ma0u6nZnBjXiE3qyUrc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:mime-version:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to:to :references:message-id:x-mailer; b=guqRYP0NfEf2MyqE1KYkRZ6LjzrgeqvtEkqGr4WFhIlVEPkiN9kc+zArpuqsPruVcH 3VH0/dfJPg618mqGymnezPCbxnhlU5Hvb19K5OWTNE6pMemVN8Rip14E00li1YSi89it nuXbxBRLHkBqw+bfQTi8E9vhgQVwgVn2fH0Ug= Received: by 10.227.196.10 with SMTP id ee10mr999788wbb.209.1299771655242; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 07:40:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (def92-4-82-225-58-213.fbx.proxad.net [82.225.58.213]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w25sm2524323wbd.5.2011.03.10.07.40.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 10 Mar 2011 07:40:53 -0800 (PST) Sender: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot From: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-6--658095889 Subject: Re: [Shared] Is it time for the M2 release? Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:40:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: To: Apache Directory Developers List References: <10769D06-B43B-4141-9D3B-5C05CA6E1DE9@marcelot.net> <054BD58D-80B9-4487-A33F-2895BB82C9F7@marcelot.net> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) --Apple-Mail-6--658095889 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I fixed the remaining major PMD issues. As far as I understand it, the 'shared-ldap-client-all' project is meant = to only contain a minimal version of the dependencies needed to use the = API, the strict minimum. I think we can release it as is and think about it a little more in M3. Maybe it's not really required to have this project, 'shared-all' might = be enough. Third parties dependencies being shaded in it also concerns me. Ok guys, I will start the release process for M2, now. Regards, Pierre-Arnaud On 9 mars 2011, at 19:55, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote: > Ok guys, >=20 > I think I fixed most of the required issues before the release of M2. >=20 > I still have a couple of PMD errors to fix and see the = 'shared-ldap-client-all' issue. >=20 > I might be able to start a release tomorrow in the afternoon. >=20 > Regards, > Pierre-Arnaud >=20 > On 8 mars 2011, at 09:50, Stefan Seelmann wrote: >=20 >> Please see DIRSHARED-99 and DIRSHARED-100. >>=20 >> On Mar 8, 2011 9:18 AM, "Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot" = wrote: >> > Hi Stefan, >> >=20 >> > On 7 mars 2011, at 22:11, Stefan Seelmann wrote: >> >=20 >> >> Sure. >> >>=20 >> >> I wanted to fix the legal issues, but I think I won't have time to >> >> work on it before next weekend, and event then I'm not sure, = sorry. >> >=20 >> > Do you remember what kind of issues it was? >> > I thought we had already fixed legal issues with the release of M1 = and the various additions of 3rd parties licenses and attributions in = the Notice files. >> >=20 >> >> Another thing to check is that the distribution packages include = all >> >> dependencies. >> >=20 >> > Yeah, that's also something I wanted to test before the release. = Especially a standard logging implementation like Log4J (letting the = ability to be replaced by another specific implementation if users = prefer some other). >> >=20 >> >> A last thing is that I'm confused about that new >> >> shared-ldap-client-all module which shades lot of shared modules = but >> >> also 3rd party dependencies. I don't see what it is good for. >> >=20 >> > I agree, shading all shared modules is a good idea but I'm not so = sure about 3rd parties dependencies too. >> > I guess the resulting jar should contain "shared"-only classes. >> >=20 >> > I'll look into that if it's ok with everyone. >> >=20 >> > Regards, >> > Pierre-Arnaud >> >=20 >> >=20 >> >> Kind regards >> >> Stefan >> >>=20 >> >>=20 >> >> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot = wrote: >> >>> Hi guys, >> >>>=20 >> >>> I was just wondering it wouldn't be a good time to schedule the = M2 release. >> >>>=20 >> >>> Heavy refactoring have been done since the last M1 milestone, = trunk is pretty stable now and the current activity is pretty low. >> >>>=20 >> >>> Before starting a new phase of heavy coding, it might be a good = idea to get the M2 release in the hands of our users. >> >>>=20 >> >>> WDYT? >> >>>=20 >> >>> Regards, >> >>> Pierre-Arnaud >> >>>=20 >> >>>=20 >> >>>=20 >> >>>=20 >> >=20 >>=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail-6--658095889 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Ok = guys,

I think I fixed most of the required issues = before the release of M2.

I still have a couple = of PMD errors to fix and see the 'shared-ldap-client-all' = issue.

I might be able to start a release = tomorrow in the = afternoon.

Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud
=

On 8 mars 2011, at 09:50, Stefan Seelmann = wrote:

Please see DIRSHARED-99 and DIRSHARED-100.

On Mar = 8, 2011 9:18 AM, "Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot" <pa@marcelot.net> wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On 7 mars 2011, at = 22:11, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
>
>> Sure.
>>
>> I wanted to fix the = legal issues, but I think I won't have time to
>> work on it = before next weekend, and event then I'm not sure, sorry.
> =
> Do you remember what kind of issues it was?
> I thought we had already fixed legal issues with the release of M1 = and the various additions of 3rd parties licenses and attributions in = the Notice files.
>
>> Another thing to check is that = the distribution packages include all
>> dependencies.
>
> Yeah, that's also something I = wanted to test before the release. Especially a standard logging = implementation like Log4J (letting the ability to be replaced by another = specific implementation if users prefer some other).
>
>> A last thing is that I'm confused about that = new
>> shared-ldap-client-all module which shades lot of shared = modules but
>> also 3rd party dependencies. I don't see what it = is good for.
>
> I agree, shading all shared modules is a good idea but I'm = not so sure about 3rd parties dependencies too.
> I guess the = resulting jar should contain "shared"-only classes.
>
> = I'll look into that if it's ok with everyone.
>
> Regards,
> Pierre-Arnaud
>
> =
>> Kind regards
>> Stefan
>>
>> =
>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot = <pa@marcelot.net> = wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> I was just = wondering it wouldn't be a good time to schedule the M2 = release.
>>>
>>> Heavy refactoring have been = done since the last M1 milestone, trunk is pretty stable now and the = current activity is pretty low.
>>>
>>> Before starting a new phase of heavy = coding, it might be a good idea to get the M2 release in the hands of = our users.
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>> =
>>> Regards,
>>> Pierre-Arnaud
>>>
>>> =
>>>
>>>
>



= --Apple-Mail-6--658095889--