Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: mail@stefan-seelmann.de
In-Reply-To: <5266544098264893418@unknownmsgid>
References: <AANLkTinA1iMWLfYKO5GG3=1wZOoVFSbCSkS-F9ZD2N53@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinV9n2pLg6dDQexR7vA1_ySW+Or54WpEE2vEgF3@mail.gmail.com>
	<4D8A158D.9040804@gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=nwabpPGYrQdm7FoZSU2z=7TRQpVtxDQYh1kUg@mail.gmail.com>
	<5266544098264893418@unknownmsgid>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 13:17:51 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTimAgyM7feFW4UZLj_ViWFee9RVOPa2=e80CkmKr@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Go for a Apache Directory Studio 1.5.4 Bugfix Release
From: Stefan Seelmann <seelmann@apache.org>
To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Pierre-Arnaud,

for all Jiras that were marked "Fixed for 1.5.4" I applied the missing
patches to the 1.5.x branch or removed the "Fixed for 1.5.4" label, so
the list of resolved/closed issues for 1.5.4 should now be consistent.
Next step is check the issues that are solved only in trunk and decide
if a backport makes sense. Then we should go through the list of open
bugs (and maybe improvements) and decide which issues are worth to fix
for 1.5.4 or 2.0.0 or both.

Another note: I had some trouble setting up the build for 1.5.x branch
and trunk because 1.5.x needs Maven2 and trunk needs Maven3. I don't
think it makes sense to migrate the 1.5.x branch to Maven3, right? My
default "mvn" command is M3. My first attempt was to create a symbolic
link "mvn2" that points to M2 and to use "mvn2 studio:eclipse" etc..
But that don't work because the studio:eclipse plugin launches another
"mvn" process which is then M3. So I removed maven completely from my
PATH and only added the right one in each console window.

Kind Regards
Stefan


On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
<pajbam@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Stefan, Emmanuel,
>
> +1 for both ideas:
> =C2=A0 - 1.5.4 bug fix release
> =C2=A0 - milestone releases for the 2.0 branch
>
> I'm not sure all the bugs fixed in trunk were back ported to the 1.5.4 br=
anch.
> I saw you were starting to do it, Stefan.
>
> I'm away from home and a computer until late afternoon today.
> I will be available after that to help.
>
> Regards,
> Pierre-Arnaud
>
> Le 23 mars 2011 =C3=A0 21:18, Stefan Seelmann <seelmann@apache.org> a =C3=
=A9crit :
>
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com>=
 wrote:
>>> On 3/23/11 4:37 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>
>>>> it's almost one year since the last Apache Directory Studio release
>>>> (1.5.3).
>>>> I think the 2.0.0 release will take some more time.
>>>>
>>>> So I think we should release a 1.5.4 bugfix release in the next future=
.
>>>>
>>>> I browsed the issue list in Jira and there are already some issues mar=
ked
>>>> as
>>>> fixed for 1.5.4. There are also many bugs reported by users within the
>>>> last
>>>> year we should fix. Last not least I also found some issues with MS AD=
 and
>>>> ADAM I'd like to fix.
>>>
>>> yes, sure. Or we may also want to eat the Milestone road instead. Like
>>> releasing a 2.0.0-M1 instead of a 1.5.4.
>>
>> IMO that are distinct cases.
>>
>> Milestone releases to a 2.0.0 would be good, +1.
>>
>> But the current trunk contains lot of changes. Not all people want to
>> use a milestone to work on productive directory servers. I think a
>> bugfix release of the current stable version makes sense.
>>
>> Kind Regards
>> Stefan
>