Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 70748 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2011 07:37:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Mar 2011 07:37:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 25561 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2011 07:37:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 25330 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2011 07:36:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 25207 invoked by uid 99); 27 Mar 2011 07:36:51 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 07:36:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of pajbam@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.178] (HELO mail-iw0-f178.google.com) (209.85.214.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 07:36:43 +0000 Received: by iwn9 with SMTP id 9so3059126iwn.37 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 00:36:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:references:from:in-reply-to:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ECapPd1uNTxrleEka5OtJZpSCpHNZukzkptNvZv/pWk=; b=E59NGlPh1QDkklD0PHHsS/eCicHEOHikHe55eBIVwHAgkP5s7nTNPDHL47SjZN0Nf4 N2M8pFLNUVs8/S08D/keaARcwEc1Ts3nckMVbQerd+EIa1PJnVE6cAL7s3KXKEgEfGIt +vmw3uX5apDh1yip3gPj/TSRPCrREkl0DTz7c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:from:in-reply-to:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GX+pUFi9PbBXw+Wf3+5WX0z9XXY7d456En5kl92ELr0hfkE/2+imRrUAeEMHtXABVg 29zAkTIKlUkqsHIF9DXpkvx6YNWYcdMb8Fl4Owj0vgnsIL9xO52GVDgO4zdKg/Zf1zyC P7PF7Eal/hHSGb7d4nw6EDAzn47wuYSL5pTSA= Received: by 10.42.9.29 with SMTP id k29mr257095ick.97.1301211382057; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 00:36:22 -0700 (PDT) References: <4D8A158D.9040804@gmail.com> From: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8F190) Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 09:36:18 +0200 Message-ID: <5266544098264893418@unknownmsgid> Subject: Re: Go for a Apache Directory Studio 1.5.4 Bugfix Release To: Apache Directory Developers List Cc: "elecharny@apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Stefan, Emmanuel, +1 for both ideas: - 1.5.4 bug fix release - milestone releases for the 2.0 branch I'm not sure all the bugs fixed in trunk were back ported to the 1.5.4 bran= ch. I saw you were starting to do it, Stefan. I'm away from home and a computer until late afternoon today. I will be available after that to help. Regards, Pierre-Arnaud Le 23 mars 2011 =E0 21:18, Stefan Seelmann a =E9crit = : > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny = wrote: >> On 3/23/11 4:37 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: >>> >>> Hi devs, >>> >>> it's almost one year since the last Apache Directory Studio release >>> (1.5.3). >>> I think the 2.0.0 release will take some more time. >>> >>> So I think we should release a 1.5.4 bugfix release in the next future. >>> >>> I browsed the issue list in Jira and there are already some issues mark= ed >>> as >>> fixed for 1.5.4. There are also many bugs reported by users within the >>> last >>> year we should fix. Last not least I also found some issues with MS AD = and >>> ADAM I'd like to fix. >> >> yes, sure. Or we may also want to eat the Milestone road instead. Like >> releasing a 2.0.0-M1 instead of a 1.5.4. > > IMO that are distinct cases. > > Milestone releases to a 2.0.0 would be good, +1. > > But the current trunk contains lot of changes. Not all people want to > use a milestone to work on productive directory servers. I think a > bugfix release of the current stable version makes sense. > > Kind Regards > Stefan