directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel L├ęcharny <>
Subject Re: [Shared] [Model] What was the reason for removing the schema entity interfaces like AttributeType?
Date Tue, 08 Mar 2011 07:32:28 GMT
On 3/8/11 12:38 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny<>  wrote:
>> On 3/8/11 12:09 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>>> I'm sitting here starring at this nest and wondering what
>>> the heck I should do first.
>> Wait for M2 to be out ... :)
> Why?
> First I am in a personal branch and second I merged that last time to
> prep for M2 so nothing will be merged to impact the M2. This work is
> for M3. We already check pointed M2.
>> keep in mind that the SchemaManager and all the classes were modified in
>> order to allow a better schema handling.
> OK I'm not going to bother here. I'll just fix the problems I see.
> Now, we are facing some new issues
>> because we want to allow schema objects to be loadable, which is a different
>> target, and for sure needs some heavy refactoring.
> OK.
>> I suggest we close M2 now, and then discuss about what to do with the
>> SchemaManager.
> Again this has no bearing. Please see above.
Np at all. I thought you where working on trunks. No reason to stop 
anything if you are in a branch.

For the record, yes, we have to refactoring this code now that we are exposing the Schema.

Emmanuel L├ęcharny

View raw message