Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 13031 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2011 20:35:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2011 20:35:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 2809 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2011 20:35:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 2633 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2011 20:35:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 2626 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2011 20:35:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:35:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.178] (HELO mail-wy0-f178.google.com) (74.125.82.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:35:18 +0000 Received: by wyb42 with SMTP id 42so576556wyb.37 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 12:34:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lztL2+Gq8yngQWJjvMRnvTJuRPh7ayORw+JIwWlLt+w=; b=sHhzcy8B8ik14Y96taVaLQZn8NbmHM96WXlG6xX/sSuVk85QxDPLYLD3cXMJ+9HNSe fQUZuJQcZavaD5GknaBGWD65gWj9QpaSEU1ecu89wO6xcUQYobkgJgmrGkZOOwYGs3XA LFXLBLMewNkQnhIwPHPcH7lHyqttvVOkLblZM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=XhKGO1fXSasS9pVO7BCviAreQ0M6Hoxt4+U3iv30gPAT5NMTVbws+IGa5ZYDh478U3 ekKiuF9fKDNGwZv/x80+2IX7OwPYrwaB4VWnR4sTs6VXh6iy+OCv0RDiLRInWQv+EVDV JbPVzVdDT7PMZ0K7g8rRQbMJLNcDgAigocfWQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.147.16 with SMTP id j16mr19531033wbv.125.1297283697767; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 12:34:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.217.3.70 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 12:34:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D52F8C8.1090601@apache.org> References: <4D52F8C8.1090601@apache.org> Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 14:34:57 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Shared Release: version number From: Jesse McConnell To: Apache Directory Developers List , felixk@apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org OSGI like those 4 part versions of major.minor.micro.qualifier so definitely stick with that approach imo cheers, jesse -- jesse mcconnell jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 14:27, Felix Knecht wrote: > On 02/09/2011 09:18 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> just a quick question about the version number. Should we go for >> 1.0-M1 or 1.0.0-M1 ? >> >> I ask because I first tested 1.0-M1-SNAPSHOT. The Felix >> maven-bundle-plugin normalizes that to Bundle-Version >> 1.0.0.M1-SNAPSHOT, so in Studio we reference it as 1.0.0.M1-SNAPSHOT. >> >> So I'd suggest to go for 1.0.0-M1, then the Maven version and the OSGi >> version are more equal. > > I agree > > Regards > Felix > >> >> Kind Regards, >> Stefan >> > >