Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 45119 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2011 18:34:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2011 18:34:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 71273 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2011 18:34:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 71083 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2011 18:34:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 71073 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2011 18:34:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 18:34:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.178] (HELO mail-iy0-f178.google.com) (209.85.210.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 18:34:01 +0000 Received: by iym1 with SMTP id 1so491839iym.37 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 10:33:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.178.134 with SMTP id bm6mr1651684icb.523.1297276420044; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 10:33:40 -0800 (PST) Sender: mail@stefan-seelmann.de Received: by 10.231.39.141 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 10:33:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 19:33:39 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: RJwdjzlNA_B44Z_MclMzWflcE4A Message-ID: Subject: Re: Release JUnit Add-ons 0.1 - take 2 From: Stefan Seelmann To: Apache Directory Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: > On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: >> Hi devs, >> >> I'd like to release the first version of our JUnit Add-ons. >> >> The JUnit Add-ons contain helpers for concurrent unit test that are >> used only internally. >> >> Please note that it includes source files copied from [3], licensed >> under ALv2. According to [4] the original copyright notice and license >> header is unchanged. Attribution has been added to NOTICE and LICENSE >> file. >> >> The tag can be found at [1], the staging repository can be found at [2]. >> >> I'll continue to release the staging repository after the grace period >> of 4 hours. >> >> Kind Regards, >> Stefan >> >> >> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/buildtools/junit-addons/tags/0.1/ >> [2] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedirectory-046/ >> [3] http://code.google.com/p/mycila/source/browse/mycila-junit/tags/mycila-junit-1.0.ga/src/main/java/com/mycila/junit/concurrent >> [4] http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party >> > > Hold on a second. We need a formal vote on this! > > The 4 hour exception to the 72 hour vote process is just for the TLP > pom. The TLP pom does not have the same legal requirements as a > standard src/bin release artifact. > > https://cwiki.apache.org/DIRxDEV/top-level-pom-management-policy.html > > There needs to be a review of the release artifact and the 72 vote > period is mandatory. I'm really sorry to say this but we have to roll > back this release and follow the standard operating procedures. My understanding was that we agreed to release the internal projects with the simplified process [5], we did multiple releases this way, including a src/bin artifact [6]. But I agree that this isn't/wasn't a simple release an a more formal vote should have beed done, sorry for my fault. Kind Regards, Stefan [5] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@directory.apache.org/msg29764.html [6] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@directory.apache.org/msg29861.html