From dev-return-36891-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org Wed Feb 02 14:22:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 95406 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2011 14:22:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2011 14:22:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 81059 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2011 14:22:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 80968 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2011 14:22:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 80961 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2011 14:22:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:22:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of pajbam@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.50] (HELO mail-bw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.214.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:21:59 +0000 Received: by bwg12 with SMTP id 12so725982bwg.37 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:21:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to :x-mailer; bh=4BxA4nynYeonqDdJWOua8Yu2cQUw8nfHLoL8JNCaw20=; b=fltGSNyo2OwJDmNSrdjUvt1+aiPvrIdLnaxEhHDkdpnDKW9kkl1/Wp8pQNppwqIJTA H/w2C/P5we8ldiroZxGhDYXX7w6CpqrSGp0HUfBhu16lg+cnI4bG83tl9CGbCIjVMoAK sLxOL3ibNCjXapaLmTOlzoSDMItDVzJT9JEW0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=M4gR46uG6XIWATH0m0NdT0sOXsK1+JtccyiUoPWhIIDzHq4zSCxC7iyjQ5p8iiQLaa ujig/ncwghyp4PtRe4HyM19W6uT3OQ3QB/K7riCn69/lQF0IgwYDtZ0LUjJ2PnygIaVO EJzjIao6SCCdcPOiS403bC4RNHmc70xUA2Ldo= Received: by 10.204.76.145 with SMTP id c17mr8085641bkk.52.1296656498025; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:21:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.52] (lon92-10-78-226-4-211.fbx.proxad.net [78.226.4.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v1sm11692253bkt.17.2011.02.02.06.21.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:21:37 -0800 (PST) Sender: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Changes to have a consistent naming in controls From: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot In-Reply-To: <4D49607F.8090506@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:21:34 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4D49607F.8090506@gmail.com> To: "Apache Directory Developers List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 However, I'm not sure we need to change BasicControl to an interface.=20 It would just be an empty interface extending the Control interface. Not = that useful to me. I would rather stay with the existing class, as is. Regards, Pierre-Arnaud On 2 f=E9vr. 2011, at 14:47, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > Hi guys, >=20 > I have listed all he controls we currently support, and I have some = renaming to suggest to have a consistent naming scheme. First, let's see = what is the current hierarchy and the changes I propose : >=20 > - all controls are implementing the Control interface > - we have an interface for each control, except for BasicControl : I = suggest we change the BasicControl to become an interface, and that we = create a BasicControlImpl class > - all the control intefraces starting with a *I* should be renamed by = removing this *I* (that's 7 controls to rename) >=20 > I have still to analyze the decorators hierarchy. >=20 > thoughts ? >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel L=E9charny > www.iktek.com >=20