From dev-return-36917-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org Thu Feb 03 17:58:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 93307 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2011 17:58:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Feb 2011 17:58:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 11690 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2011 17:58:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 11504 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2011 17:58:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 11497 invoked by uid 99); 3 Feb 2011 17:58:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 17:58:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.178] (HELO mail-wy0-f178.google.com) (74.125.82.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 17:58:29 +0000 Received: by wyb42 with SMTP id 42so1397009wyb.37 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:58:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=O5UeoNtlFU98yOKT8FzXVy9ebENae2PLpbxaYoFzGcU=; b=jaZ5kA0qs+xy25loGceAIhSZHUPxqe/4rA2aLB47Gq1bON140pRNhhdkRBQWdalePA YJeCmw8CsCw+r6P5t+OKiIYppoLUekSXFJdcY2eoO47cpnkNNguv2NhJiuK/72j2aeUz rvfTqv9Y57IR0sIjlL8EsCxW4MLhRpx1jFT6k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=a6l4EaDRiBZJEkIVzUSkGkZCm8/jP1Fm5fg3PkY9iZQnxKyzb1prlDeluw6JrjbyLI aBDXfMSJB1CqiLS6kP1BvzJOrC05KIeAxFDWe1d+sC79ywr39M3Arz/1mzRgeI5SNMZO r/j50QVZrqCI1vgrq21DoStQpRFp7VD8W2B6A= Received: by 10.227.132.84 with SMTP id a20mr3687252wbt.56.1296755888239; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:58:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from emmanuel-lecharnys-MacBook-Pro.local (lon92-10-78-226-4-211.fbx.proxad.net [78.226.4.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u9sm783697wbg.0.2011.02.03.09.58.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:58:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D4AECAE.80704@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:58:06 +0100 From: Emmanuel Lecharny Reply-To: elecharny@apache.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: Problems trying to get back in sync with ADS References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit I think you just was very unlikely to have built the m1 branch just in the middle of 2 commits. I forgot to commit one class, and I did it a few minutes later. If you svnupped in between, then you probably got those errors. Please svn up again, and give it a try. And, yes, m1 may be unstable, even if we try not to break the branch. On 2/3/11 6:25 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: > This branch is unstable. We created it specifically to start moving > towards the envisaged m1 release vision for shared. So you're probably > best working in trunk. > > Unfortunately we destabilized trunk before but now it's back in order, > thanks mostly to Emmanuel immense effort on the codec. So to protect > y'all we're working in m1. We will synchronize with trunk in check > pointed stages (stabilization points) to keep you up to date. > > Regards, > Alex > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Richard Feezel wrote: >> I've been tied up with other issues but I'm trying to get up-to-date with >> the ADS project. >> >> I've been skimming the messages on this list as they've been coming out and >> really appreciate the major effort to re-factor the code to a more >> meaningful and consistent form. >> >> Just now I did an SVN checkout of >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/branches/m1 as I understand that >> this branch is expected to be the path forward. >> >> I've installed Maven 3.0.2 and after the successful checkout I tried "mvn >> install -DskipTests" since I understand that the tests have not yet been >> brought up to date. >> >> Sadly the build failed with: >> >> [ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : >> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------- >> [ERROR] >> /home/rfeezel/ADSm1/src/shared/ldap/src/test/java/org/apache/directory/shared/ldap/codec/controls/replication/SyncStateValueControlTest.java:[37,67] >> package org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.message.control.replication does >> not exist >> [ERROR] >> /home/rfeezel/ADSm1/src/shared/ldap/src/test/java/org/apache/directory/shared/ldap/codec/controls/replication/SyncInfoValueControlTest.java:[35,80] >> cannot find symbol >> symbol : class ISyncInfoValue >> location: package >> org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.codec.controls.replication.syncInfoValue >> [ERROR] >> /home/rfeezel/ADSm1/src/shared/ldap/src/test/java/org/apache/directory/shared/ldap/codec/controls/replication/SyncInfoValueControlTest.java:[37,67] >> package org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.message.control.replication does >> not exist >> [ERROR] >> /home/rfeezel/ADSm1/src/shared/ldap/src/test/java/org/apache/directory/shared/ldap/codec/controls/replication/SyncRequestValueControlTest.java:[38,67] >> package org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.message.control.replication does >> not exist >> [ERROR] >> /home/rfeezel/ADSm1/src/shared/ldap/src/test/java/org/apache/directory/shared/ldap/codec/controls/replication/SyncStateValueControlTest.java:[76,22] >> cannot find symbol >> symbol : variable SyncStateTypeEnum >> location: class >> org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.codec.controls.replication.SyncStateValueControlTest >> >> and many other errors. >> >> My question is, is it too early to expect this branch to compile regularly? >> >> My general practice using a subversion repository is to push updates only >> when I know that they at least compile, even if not well tested. Perhaps >> the group has a different philosophy, especially when working in a branch. >> >> Some guidance on what to expect would be appreciated. >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> Richard M Feezel >> rfeezel@gmail.com >> -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com