From dev-return-36908-apmail-directory-dev-archive=directory.apache.org@directory.apache.org Wed Feb 02 23:47:47 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 93853 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2011 23:47:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Feb 2011 23:47:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 6738 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2011 23:47:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 6692 invoked by uid 500); 2 Feb 2011 23:47:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 6685 invoked by uid 99); 2 Feb 2011 23:47:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 23:47:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [62.179.121.40] (HELO fep20.mx.upcmail.net) (62.179.121.40) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 23:47:39 +0000 Received: from edge01.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.236]) by viefep20-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.02.02 201-2260-120-106-20100312) with ESMTP id <20110202234706.BHXE1667.viefep20-int.chello.at@edge01.upcmail.net> for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 00:47:06 +0100 Received: from asgard.felixknecht.ch ([84.74.100.246]) by edge01.upcmail.net with edge id 3Bn41g01e5JxopQ01Bn58e; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:47:06 +0100 X-SourceIP: 84.74.100.246 Message-ID: <4D49ECF8.5030208@apache.org> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 00:47:04 +0100 From: Felix Knecht Reply-To: felixk@apache.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: [VCS] Subversion clutter reduction References: <4D492FC5.9010104@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=kR4HTYXl3FXdRAFjS5RpcnDbDNViz/VYMWXR75RtSM0= c=1 sm=0 a=-OdhlBMHJhcA:10 a=pXoq77xVGrQA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=mV9VRH-2AAAA:8 a=EIcLo9oASnT-t1peYe0A:9 a=5SWQVHm5QRb3u3qnuwO64Exlv_YA:4 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=KHh02E6fhqkA:10 a=88iI8knYSJUA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 On 02/03/2011 12:26 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Felix Knecht wrote: >>> On 02/01/2011 07:33 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: >>>> >>>> We seem to have a lot of high level projects/components appearing [0]. >>>> Perhaps we can consolidate some of them. >>>> >>>> We might have a top level site/manuals/documentation area where >>>> apacheds-manuals can go. Other manuals may arrise as well. Seems samples >>>> and >>>> skins can go under manuals? >>>> >>>> We have a number of build tooling and resource projects as well as a >>>> resources under the project project [1]. >>>> >>>> How about consolidating a little like so? >>>> >>>> Manuals/Documentation: >>>> - apacheds-manuals >>>> - samples >>>> - skins >>>> >>>> Resources >>>> - [1] >>>> - checkstyle-configurations >>>> >>>> Tooling: >>>> - studio-plugin >>>> - junit-addons >>> >>> +1 >>> >>>> Triplesec => Deceased ? >>> >>> I didn't took part during the incubation phase of the directory project, so >>> I don't know if it's possible to let the Triplesec just decease or if the >>> decease needs a formal process. >> >> We never defined a formal process but it's been a long time since we >> worked on it. If we revive we'll rewrite this piece all over from >> scratch. >> >>> If it can just decease: >>> +1 >>> >> >> Go for it. >> >>> BTW >>> What do you exactly mean by decease? >>> - Let it where it is but don't touch it anymore >>> - Move it somewhere to the attic >> >> Yeah this is synonymous with the attic. > > But the important question is (and I think that's what Felix means), > if we want to move it into the Directory Project's own 'deceased' > folder, or move it to the official Apache Attic [1][2]. That's what I meant. Thanks for clarification Stefan. Regards Felix > > [1] http://attic.apache.org/ > [2] http://attic.apache.org/process.html >