directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Karasulu <akaras...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [Shared] [SCM] Thinking about some hierarchy in shared.
Date Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:19:39 GMT
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecharny@apache.org> wrote:
> On 2/28/11 1:02 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>>
>> Hi Emmanuel,
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny<elecharny@gmail.com>
>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     ldap/
>>>>         codec/
>>>>         model/
>>>>         schema/
>>>>         schema-converter/
>>>
>>> wouldn't it be better to make it a sub-module ?
>>
>> Yes these are all sub modules.
>
> I mean, schema-convertor as a sub-model under schema/

OH OK I see. Sure yeah.

>>>>
>>>>         client-api/
>>>>         codec-standalone/
>>>>         all/
>>>
>>> Shouldn't it be a separated module ?
>>
>> Hmm I don't quite understand you here. These are all separate modules
>> broken down for better hierarchical organization. Could you be a bit
>> more specific, I want to make sure I understand you fully.
>
> The 'all' module shoudl'nt it be moved at the top level ?

This all module is for all of LDAP not all of shared. The idea is to
create one big shaded jar file that can be used instead of all our
dependencies. It's more for people dropping in this jar instead of
using an archetype for a Maven based LDAP project that can pull down
all the deps.

> What is this module about ?

This all-in-one jar should not be used in Maven projects as a
dependency. It's for quick use and testing. Down the line it can even
have a main in the jar to enable use as a quick use command line
client.

>> The archetype module? It contains some Maven archetypes for rapidly
>> setting up new extension oriented maven projects. Like for example an
>> archetype to start a new control project or a new ext req/resp pair.
>
> Ahh, ok. Call it maven-archetype, then, it would be more explicit.
>>
>>> Seems ok to me, more or less, but I think we should reorganize after M2.
>>
>> I don't see a benefit before or after M2. Just curious though why you
>> want to do this after M2? If you have a preference we can cater to
>> that.
>
> Not a big deal, trying to connect the two mails you sent, was thinking you
> wanted to get M2 out now.
>
> Sorry for the short answers, I'm a bit busy dealing with real life atm.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>
>

Mime
View raw message