directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emmanuel Lecharny <elecha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Control package changes
Date Thu, 03 Feb 2011 23:18:12 GMT
On 2/4/11 12:14 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Alex Karasulu<akarasulu@apache.org>  wrote:
>> Create new packages for extra controls, the 2nd class of optional
>> controls of which we have the following for replication and ppolicy:
>>
>> PasswordPolicy
>> SyncDoneValue
>> SyncInfoValue
>> SyncModifyDn
>> SyncRequestValue
>> SyncStateValue
> I just wonder why those controls are named "...Value"? Sorry if this
> was already discussed and I missed it.

It hasn't been discussed, it's the name those controls have in RFC 4533 :

http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4533.txt, par 2.2, 2.3, etc

>> Bases:
>> [PRIVATE PACKAGES]
>> org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.controls.impl
>> org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.extended.impl
>>
>> Subpackages:
>> [PRIVATE PACKAGES]
>> org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.controls.impl.ppolicy
>> org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.controls.impl.syncInfoValue
>> org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.controls.impl.syncDoneValue
>> org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.controls.impl.syncRequestValue
>> org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.controls.impl.syncStateValue
>> org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.extras.controls.impl.syncModifyDn
> Do we really need different packages for all the SyncRepl controls?
Nope. Alex just merged them all in a extra.controls package.
> When reading RFC 4533 the syncInfoValue is not a control, but the
> value of an immediate response message. Should it be put to the
> 'contols' package then?

Very good remark. I have no valid answer right now...


-- 
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel L├ęcharny
www.iktek.com


Mime
View raw message