Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 45404 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2011 20:30:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jan 2011 20:30:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 67933 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2011 20:30:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 67898 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jan 2011 20:30:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 67891 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jan 2011 20:30:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 20:30:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of akarasulu@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.178] (HELO mail-wy0-f178.google.com) (74.125.82.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 20:30:20 +0000 Received: by wyb42 with SMTP id 42so4928243wyb.37 for ; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 12:29:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=tKJrp4UcalxJHrm8fRY1SV6Uxk9gsI0fbvDZFyAyAIw=; b=sknflkvj86kfJCv/UAcOefotvbVWbMQUjDdqR9/BPR5CRiAKleKpHfOO6HoMLwayCT Hn0mTNbW2jNJprPYc43X9PwC3ysUQSiaU0Ny8BEPPrS5xRsSDiKaeego82t7NNA8drzl GyrfJlbs9Ig3D5nRlKO3HKSMZjwe5PhezY3dg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=h/EkhRM5cezA7NtC8Y3KWrv/jgHasAfsxC00qMXIyGbNk5vUkgnbfs6IJztJWFWgwG jkKm9qtZzcgQgw/uG6qdt5fjSzRYsS0ReAfT/NUZtnaiTCy4ifwoq7PIxOCN6HtvMVYr CIrQAE+hi+yIybMxa1IHtStOWZIu8Jnm+gHt8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.162.70 with SMTP id x48mr10190351wek.4.1296419399406; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 12:29:59 -0800 (PST) Sender: akarasulu@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.73.78 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 12:29:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 22:29:59 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7QTVpurit8SfEqE7Cq7U02vXMHA Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r1063987 - in /directory: apacheds/trunk/core-api/src/main/java/org/apache/directory/server/core/interceptor/context/ apacheds/trunk/core-jndi/src/main/java/org/apache/directory/server/core/jndi/ apacheds/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/ From: Alex Karasulu To: Apache Directory Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f44f32c81343049b1629ea X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f44f32c81343049b1629ea Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > >> >> It doesn't make sense - and it's also dangerous - to have a static >> instance of a control. It is possible to alter the criticality of a >> control which may cause issues when using the singleton in a >> multi-threaded environment. >> >> > Yes this is not good. I forgot about being able to vary the criticality of > even the standard controls. I will revert this. Thanks for the heads up. > OK I fixed this. Thanks for spotting it. This is kind of telling me it's always good to go slow and steady so all eyes have a chance to see the problems. -- Alex Karasulu My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/ Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org To set up a meeting with me: http://tungle.me/AlexKarasulu --001485f44f32c81343049b1629ea Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Alex Karasulu <= span dir=3D"ltr"><akarasulu@apac= he.org> wrote:


On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 a= t 12:13 AM, Stefan Seelmann <seelmann@apache.org> wrote:

It doesn't make sense - and it's also dangerous - to have a static<= br> instance of a control. It is possible to alter the criticality of a
control which may cause issues when using the singleton in a
multi-threaded environment.


Y= es this is not good. I forgot about being able to vary the criticality of e= ven the standard controls. I will revert this. Thanks for the heads up.=A0<= /div>

OK I fixed this. Thanks for spottin= g it.=A0

This is kind of telling me it's always good= to go slow and steady so all eyes have a chance to see the problems.=A0
--
Alex Karasulu
My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/
Apache Directory Server = :: http://directory.apache.org<= br> Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org
To set up a meeting with me: http://tungle.me/AlexKarasulu
--001485f44f32c81343049b1629ea--