directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Karasulu <akaras...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Maven 3 and site generation
Date Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:13:38 GMT
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/25/11 10:09 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Stefan Seelmann
>> <mail@stefan-seelmann.de>  wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Felix Knecht<felixk@apache.org>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 01/24/2011 11:09 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> You think it might be too aggressive to just push for M3 and not have
>>>>> to deal with M2 at all?
>>>>
>>>> When pushing to M3 only we should be sure to have a CI build based on M3
>>>> [1], otherwise we either can skip CI build (and site deployment) or
>>>> we'll
>>>> run into problems.
>>>
>>> Yes, it was my intention to first add additional M3 support so we can
>>> test it on Hudson.
>>
>> Just tested with the 'project' project: Maven 3.0.2 is available on
>> Hudson, build with site generation works [2].
>>
>> I would continue to migrate all projects to support both M2 and M3, if
>> everything works we can decide to drop M2 support. Before we should
>> also check that the release process still works. Any helping hand is
>> welcomed.
>
> Atm, you can migrate the hudson builds to M3, IMO.
>
> I hope we will be able to release a ldap-API 1.0-M1 soon, it will be perfect
> to test the release process.

So y'all are telling me Hudson will automatically release at the press
of a button now? Or am I just way off :).

-- 
Alex Karasulu
My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/
Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org
To set up a meeting with me: http://tungle.me/AlexKarasulu

Mime
View raw message