directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jesse McConnell <jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Maven 3 and site generation
Date Mon, 24 Jan 2011 23:55:54 GMT
yes hudson supports m3

we use it in hudson @ eclipse

jesse

--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com



On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 17:36, Felix Knecht <felixk@apache.org> wrote:
> On 01/24/2011 11:09 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Stefan Seelmann<seelmann@apache.org>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi devs,
>>>
>>> our projects build well will Maven 3. An exception is the site
>>> generation which doesn't work with Maven 3 because support for
>>> <reporting>  was removed. Instead a new version of the
>>> maven-site-plugin must be used, [1] shows the migration path.
>>>
>>> I'd like to add support for Maven 3 site generation by adding the
>>> required bits. The build and site generation for Maven 2 should not be
>>> affected and will continue to work. Later, when we drop support for M2
>>> we can remove the<reporting>  sections from POMs.
>>>
>>> Kind Regards,
>>> Stefan
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-site-plugin-3.0-beta-3/maven-3.html
>>>
>>
>> You think it might be too aggressive to just push for M3 and not have
>> to deal with M2 at all?
>
> When pushing to M3 only we should be sure to have a CI build based on M3
> [1], otherwise we either can skip CI build (and site deployment) or we'll
> run into problems.
>
> Is M3 available at least for Hudson CI?
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/4mwcbczgxru3jdom
>

Mime
View raw message