Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91497 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 14:53:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 14:53:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 63986 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 14:53:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 63954 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 14:53:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 63945 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 14:53:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:53:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of pajbam@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.44] (HELO mail-ww0-f44.google.com) (74.125.82.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:53:45 +0000 Received: by wwa36 with SMTP id 36so14230621wwa.1 for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 06:53:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=y+p1uEJvwDLR9R2xRZjLfaG511wvZLCLMPeKt8yu03Y=; b=Ewv8gOs2o1b2F9V/O4sA2PBTap+gTYaMtQEctQ3326/hlyjAwne39dWuwbhP28QUKH w9nPyTA903EptAzkVsIqe70oDiEqCmfqrJ3ZhtlPH0BmQQvqj0w68SYLY0rqLlQpVlaN 8kqLmb7B8gKOiFGeCi1c7EanN8pjsVmrePVAQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=PrV5bQZiIcBxgF39tot9Jrft1QxDTLDtnNzCSGNeHHKb0m27psQ085mKFcJJv6OK3v /kBKZcItl02wRinkiclcqE+4aQLXZwoCn7ZRiEVht60YPsyPOF0ZLr4+cPbqeCw+JXg/ iPZ4cYA/BHb1I2dTLv/pRUffLBYc6LUMV2/zc= Received: by 10.216.25.136 with SMTP id z8mr414792wez.93.1291733605533; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 06:53:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.52] (lon92-10-78-226-4-211.fbx.proxad.net [78.226.4.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m7sm125802wer.42.2010.12.07.06.53.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 07 Dec 2010 06:53:23 -0800 (PST) Sender: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: About the ChangePassword server implementation From: Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 15:53:18 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4CFE4790.5070905@gmail.com> To: "Apache Directory Developers List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 7 d=E9c. 2010, at 15:48, Kiran Ayyagari wrote: > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny = wrote: >> Hi guys, >>=20 >> the ChangePassword server suffers the same issues than the Kerberos = server, >> plus a few others : >> - TCP requests won't be decoded correctly >> - the code is brittle >> - we won't support Windows changePassword protocol (RFC 3244) >>=20 >> I suggest that we temporarilly deprecate this protocol until 2.0 is = out, as >> it's not really a main component of the server, and in fact, it's = pretty >> much a side project. >>=20 > I would say +1 to this, we can fix this and release as part of a minor > release after 2.0 comes out > OR after 2.0-RC1 comes out >=20 > There are many users waiting for 2.0 of LDAP server itself and we > should push for a 2.0-RC1 > release this month. I completely agree with Kiran. +1 Regards, Pierre-Arnaud=