directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Karasulu <akaras...@apache.org>
Subject Re: shared-ldap-jndi module : is it useful ?
Date Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:53:39 GMT
This may be something we can just toss. Also shared-ldap is getting
seriously huge: we need to figure out something with respect to this before
a 1.0.

Alex

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 12/13/10 5:09 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny<elecharny@gmail.com>
>>  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> we currently have a shared-ldap-jndi module containing two classes :
>>> - JndiUtils
>>> - UniversalContextFactory
>>>
>>> The fist one of those class is duplicated in shared-ldap, as we need many
>>> of
>>> the methods it contains for the SP sub-system. We can't remove it from
>>> shared-ldap, as shared-ldap-jndi depends on shared-ldap.
>>>
>>> I'm now wondering if it makes sense to have a separate module for JNDI,
>>> and
>>> if it wouldn't be better to merge it back into shared-ldap ?
>>>
>>> I'm just asking as I'm trying to solve
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSHARED-67. The fact is that we
>>> still need JNDI inside the server, and we won't be able soon to get
>>> totally
>>> rid of it.
>>>
>>> thoughts ?
>>>
>> I looked into shared-ldap and there are 106 imports of "javax.naming".
>> As shared-ldap isn't really JNDI free I think we should move the one
>> remaining UniversalContextFactory to shared-ldap.
>>
> Yes, makes sense. This is why I suggested to merge shared-ldap and
> shared-ldap-jndi completely
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel L├ęcharny
> www.iktek.com
>
>


-- 
Alex Karasulu
My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/
Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org
To set up a meeting with me: http://tungle.me/AlexKarasulu

Mime
View raw message