directory-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot ...@marcelot.net>
Subject Re: AP roles : should we support SubSchema in 2.0
Date Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:34:10 GMT
+1

We can probably add it later when needed.

Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud

On 16 déc. 2010, at 19:38, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> currently we are supporting the following roles :
> - AccessControl
> - CollectiveAttributes
> - TriggerExecution
> - SubSchema
> 
> The last one is just present, but we don't do anything with it. The rational for such
a role is to define 'namespaces' (kindof), ie some DIT areas with a dedicated schema. This
would be interesting as we might use more than one schema in a single server.
> 
> The problem is that the server does not support more than one server.
> 
> I would suggest we don't manage SubSchema in the next version, as I'm pretty sure no
one out there will need such a feature any time soon.
> 
> Wdyt ?
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
> 


Mime
View raw message