Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 92653 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2010 12:20:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Nov 2010 12:20:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 15071 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 12:21:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-directory-dev-archive@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 14863 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2010 12:21:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@directory.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "Apache Directory Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@directory.apache.org Received: (qmail 14848 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2010 12:21:05 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 12:21:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of elecharny@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.44] (HELO mail-ww0-f44.google.com) (74.125.82.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 12:20:57 +0000 Received: by wwb18 with SMTP id 18so101297wwb.1 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 04:20:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=h6IOdNCY5bF9f4dpQIYlxesmX2GeLAsm1HvCUs6F43Y=; b=cUeQjWM8zkYWTpb8o/EErjL0D+S2gY3SzK8bCGk7BdnpC6ig0ejA4ipLcmu0z3RWvt Cc9KiB8awb486bOfb1kpQU6+FKnGYptEPjXScSA8ZH/1fXFxGPRACv+m67SCuvq7hSBV CF+kHJ/UQlNJXHjFH8salfGWthztLP3AiNJGg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=R6ojitdWoCJ2vAEbcLpa58hNvOZK+5L+s6px8JBb7O6xtpB4ITHYemFqhBTHk35oH3 oXcJeHKiv9oWFEJKhE1CXBrEGc4Lnd4mp5mMBcRyil4CrMlAm8E12Ykqe8QPzbbJmAHX YYuGPT3cojO4gnas1mJH8p6V+ktlfRbnQz04M= Received: by 10.227.72.196 with SMTP id n4mr6674564wbj.153.1289305236888; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 04:20:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from emmanuel-lecharnys-MacBook-Pro.local (lon92-10-78-226-4-211.fbx.proxad.net [78.226.4.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f14sm1050918wbe.2.2010.11.09.04.20.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 09 Nov 2010 04:20:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4CD93C8F.9010801@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:20:31 +0100 From: Emmanuel Lecharny Reply-To: elecharny@apache.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: Re: Switch to Maven 3.0 for next ADS release? References: <4CD91ADE.6060801@otego.com> In-Reply-To: <4CD91ADE.6060801@otego.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 11/9/10 10:56 AM, Felix Knecht wrote: > Shall we switch to Maven 3.0 for next release of ADS? I'm already using maven 3 since it got out. No problem so far > Maven 3 is not fully backwards compatible with Maven 2 [1]. I have fixed many warnings. We may go a bit further. > ADS/Shared build/test work for me using Maven 3, site generation (not > very surprisingly) doesn't. Studio build doesn't works for me, the > eclipse artifacts are not found. I think we can wait until Maven 3 is fully supporting Eclipse build. > > IMO it makes only sense to switch to Maven 3 when it is also available > on the CI-servers. Absolutely. In the mean time, everyone can use maven 3, but we must check that the build still works with Maven 2.2.1 -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel L�charny www.iktek.com